Africa Great Lakes Democracy Watch



Welcome to
Africa Great Lakes Democracy Watch Blog. Our objective is to promote the institutions of democracy,social justice,Human Rights,Peace, Freedom of Expression, and Respect to humanity in Rwanda,Uganda,DR Congo, Burundi,Sudan, Tanzania, Kenya,Ethiopia, and Somalia. We strongly believe that Africa will develop if only our presidents stop being rulers of men and become leaders of citizens. We support Breaking the Silence Campaign for DR Congo since we believe the democracy in Rwanda means peace in DRC. Follow this link to learn more about the origin of the war in both Rwanda and DR Congo:http://www.rwandadocumentsproject.net/gsdl/cgi-bin/library


Showing posts with label GEORGE BUSH RWANDA USA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GEORGE BUSH RWANDA USA. Show all posts

Friday, September 16, 2011

RWANDA:Rwandan President Paul Kagame’s visit and relations with Carnegie Mellon University


September 15, 2011

To:       President Jared L. Cohon
           President - Carnegie Mellon University
           5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
From:   The African Great Lakes Coalition
C/O Friends of the Congo
1629 K Street, NW Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006
RE:       Rwandan President Paul Kagame’s visit and relations with Carnegie Mellon University


Dear President Jared L. Cohon,

As a Coalition of Africa-focused human rights and peace organizations representing a broad range of individuals, including Rwandans, Ugandans, and Congolese people, we write to express our dismay at your university’s decision to welcome and inaugurate a partnership with Rwandan President Paul Kagame at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) on September 16th, 2011.

CMU’s announcements about President Kagame’s visit represent his story as one of triumph.  The institution credits Kagame heavily for the country’s recovery and growth: “[u]nder President Kagame’s leadership, Rwanda has become one of the world’s most compelling stories of economic development.”[1]  He is lauded as a man receiving “recognition for his leadership in peace building and reconciliation, development, good governance, promotion of human rights and women's empowerment, and advancement of education and ICT.”[2]  Given this perspective, it is clear why you would be excited to deliver “an important announcement regarding the collaborative role that Carnegie Mellon will play in helping Rwanda to realize its vision.”[3]

We regret to inform you that your characterization is dangerously skewed, and that, in its haste to collaborate with President Kagame, your institution may become a collaborator in the pejorative sense by supporting an unjust, oppressive regime, and an official version of Rwandan history that silences opposition and gives power to a leader who abuses it.  In 2010 a Human Rights Watch article insisted that, if "leaders continue to ignore the darker side of Kagame's story, they will only compound the problem.  Burying the truth about horrific crimes is a very effective way to sow the seeds for future grievances and more violence.”[4]  If CMU wishes to act as an agent of progress for Rwanda, it must take this darker side of Kagame’s story into account.

Consider these recent charges and reports on Kagame’s militarily aggressive activities in Congo and politically oppressive activities within Rwanda:

  • In 2008, The Spanish National Court, The Audiencia National (charged disgraced Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet), indicted forty Rwandan military officers for terrorism, mass killings, and several counts of genocide against Rwandans, Congolese, and Spanish citizens, following the 1994 genocide.[5] Spanish Judge Fernando Andreu has said he has evidence implicating Rwanda's current President Paul Kagame, who has immunity from prosecution as a head of State.

  • Following the August 2010 election where Paul Kagame won with 93% of the votes, many observers have called it fraudulent and noted that it was marred with political violence, incarceration, and intimidation and repression of press freedom. The White House issued a statement raising concerns that “[n]o one should underestimate the enormous challenges born of the genocide in 1994.  Rwanda’s progress in the face of these challenges has been remarkable, and is a testament to the people of Rwanda.  Rwanda’s stability and growing prosperity, however, will be difficult to sustain in the absence of broad political debate and open political participation.”[6]

  • On October 1, 2010, the U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNOHCHR) published The United Nations Mapping Exercise Report, which documents crimes committed in the Congo from 1993 to 2003. It singled out the crimes committed by the Rwanda army by noting that “the apparent systematic and widespread attacks described in this report reveal a number of inculpatory elements that, if proven before a competent court, could be characterized as crimes of genocide.”[7]

  • In May 2011, British news sources reported of attempted assassinations carried out by Rwandan government personnel against Rwandan refugees and exiles. [8]

  • The June 3, 2011 report from Amnesty International condemns Kagame’s government, saying “The Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), in power since the 1994 genocide, tightly controls political space, civil society and the media, contending that this is necessary to prevent renewed violence. Human rights defenders, journalists and political opponents cannot openly and publicly criticize the authorities. People who do speak out risk prosecution and imprisonment.”[9]

Many are beginning to exercise greater caution in cultivating relations with Kagame.  Locally, the Pittsburgh City Council adopted proclamation 1011-1897 on July 12, 2011, identifying the Rwandan government as a major destabilizing force in Congo and scolding the federal government for continuing to fund the Rwandan government in the face of its many human rights abuses.  Giving resources and power to Kagame means underwriting what he does with them.  As a prestigious university you will extend many resources to President Kagame, making CMU an underwriter for his vision of development and the manner in which achieves it.

If CMU is genuinely invested in sustainable peace and development in Rwanda, and if it is determined to cultivate a relationship with Kagame, we are insisting on greater caution and responsibility.  We urge you to make your partnership with Kagame conditional on improvements in his human rights record and extension of political freedoms.  Without these measures, you will open your university to a great deal of warranted criticism, negative media attention, and an almost certain historical stain as one of the institutions that supported the despotic rule of another African strongman. We invite you to partner with our organizations to work towards prioritizing economic progress as well as human rights in the East African community in general, and Rwanda in particular.


Sincerely,


The African Great Lakes Coalition (AGLC)

Saturday, June 11, 2011

UK aid cash helped African dictator buy himself a £30m jet Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2002319/UK-aid-cash-helped-African-dictator-buy-30m-jet.html#ixzz1P1B1ht3q

Costly purchase: Uganda president Yoweri Museveni spent £30m of British aid on a private jet
British aid money was used by an African dictator to buy a £30million jet, it emerged last night.
Costly purchase: Uganda president Yoweri Museveni spent £30m of British aid on a private jet
Ugandan president Yoweri Museveni bought the top-of-the-range Gulfstream G550 private plane in the same year ministers gave his poverty- ravaged country £70million.
During the same period Uganda also received around £57million from the UK through the European Union.
The autocratic 67-year-old leader – currently facing criticism for launching a violent crackdown against protesters demanding an Egyptian-style uprising – received the cash under the Labour government in 2008-09.
Mr Museveni, who fought an election with posters depicting him as Rambo, bought the new 562mph plane while millions of civilians struggled to feed themselves.
The Gulfstream G550 can carry 18 passengers in comfort and has been dubbed the ‘world’s most versatile and stylish ultra-long-range jet’. 
The revelation highlights the controversy of hard-pressed British families being asked to fork out higher taxes to pay for spurious aid projects.
The EU has been criticised by auditors for failing to measure the impact of the handouts, with much of the money lining the pockets of corrupt regimes.
The Government has carried out a sweeping review of how aid money is distributed and spent. In future, funding will be targeted on sectors, such as health and education.
Top of the range: The Gulfstream G550 is described as the 'world most versatile and stylish long-range jet' and can carry 18 passengers
Top of the range: The Gulfstream G550 is described as the 'world most versatile and stylish long-range jet' and can carry 18 passengers
But International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell is facing a backlash for expressing his desire to make the UK a ‘development superpower’.
Ministers are increasing aid spending by 34 per cent to £12billion at a time of austerity at home and Prime Minister David Cameron will again defend the policy at an event on Monday.
Discovery: Lord Ashcroft found out that public money had been used to buy the jetLast night Lord Ashcroft, the Tory peer who uncovered the use of public money to buy the jet, said it was vital that the review tightened up the rules on how developing nations spent aid money.
Discovery: Lord Ashcroft found out that public money had been used to buy the jet
He said: ‘The UK needs to be very careful before giving budgetary support to avoid extravagance such as this. It is simply a joke. We must make sure these things do not happen again as they appeared to happen too easily under Labour.’
Chris Heaton-Harris, a Tory MP and former MEP, said: ‘Government-to-government aid without proper checks just does not work. We need to be absolutely sure that every penny of UK taxpayers’ money given in aid alleviates poverty and provides good value.’
President Museveni was involved in the war that deposed brutal tyrant Idi Amin in 1979 and has led Uganda since 1986.
But recently the ex-guerilla fighter has been dogged by charges of corruption.
In 2005, health charities suspended some grants to Uganda, citing alleged financial mismanagement and last year the EU cut budget support to Uganda amid serious fears the regime was pocketing funds.
His presidential election victory in 2006 was condemned after the arrest on treason and rape charges of his main rival, Dr Kizza Besigye.
And in April, Mr Museveni’s military police attacked protesters amid growing unrest sparked by rising food and fuel prices.
A source close to Mr Mitchell said: ‘This issue dates back to the previous Labour government, who simply weren’t tough enough on waste and inefficiency.
‘There has been an overhaul of the aid programme since then.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2002319/UK-aid-cash-helped-African-dictator-buy-30m-jet.html#ixzz1P1ALZV3J
Enhanced by Zemanta

Rwanda: Memo to President Obama

June 8, 2011    Click here to view the original PDF Document         
                        No: 32/CSPR/MK/611
MEMORANDUM

MEMORANDUM
FROM RWANDAN ORGANIZATIONS BASED ABROAD

                                                                                                         
TO: His Excellency Barrack Obama
President of The United States of America
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500


Subject: President Kagame’s visit to New York and Chicago

Your Excellency:

With our respects, we, Rwandan organizations listed below, urge your government to not welcome President Paul Kagame on the US soil for a trip that is leading him to New York and Chicago as one of the ways to pressure him and his government to open a genuine democratic process that accepts critics, dialogue with political opponents and allows freedom of speech.

We strongly praised your vision and the prospect that you would like to project on Africa through primarily the speech that you delivered in the Ghana’s parliament on July 11, 2009 addressing not only the population of Ghana but also of the whole African continent in general[1].  You did lay down your views, proposed policies and whishes for Africa which reiterated and re-energized us on our commitments to continue our fight for hope of true democracy and stronger institutions particularly in Rwanda that give everyone equal rights in front of justice and economical opportunities. It has been however deceiving on the Rwanda’s side as while the situation on the ground was getting worse with more political opponents to President Kagame and journalists being put in jail or simply killed, we’ve not only seen unweave red US aid to the current regime maintained or increased in some areas but also we are seeing President Kagame often being welcomed on the US soil.

We know how much the US people in general and your administration in particular have so generously helped Rwanda in response to the aftermaths of the 1990-1994 civil war followed by genocide, mass murder and massive population movements which devastated Rwanda’s physical infrastructure and social fabric. From the ‘‘support hope’’ mission and different forms of assistance to the Government of Rwanda and civil society groups, let alone different initiatives aiming at restoring peace in the Great Lakes region, the United States has proven to be a true friend and a key player in the economic and political landscape of post-genocide Rwanda.

Nevertheless, over the past seventeen years, our concerns have been increasing with respect to seeing the donor community in general and the Unites States of America in particular not only fail to achieve their higher-order aims of fostering peace, justice, democracy and reconciliation values in post-genocide, but also to even run counter to them by encouraging the culture of impunity, dictatorship and state-capture practices. Indeed, Since 1994, as numerous key observers including Human Rights Watch, Freedom House and your own State Department through the annually Human Rights report have noted, the RPF (Rwandan Patriotic Front)-led government has been accused of committing numerous human rights abuses, assassinating or harassing political opponents, targeting human rights defenders and narrowing the space for freedom of expression and independent civil society. In addition to have invaded a neighboring country and deliberately massacred thousands of Rwandan refugees and Congolese people in the Democratic Republic of Congo, President Kagame’s regime has maintained security arrangements with and provided weapons to armed proxy groups who continue to operate and commit serious human rights abuses in the DRC, including killings and rape.2

On October 1, 2010, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights published the report of its human rights mapping exercise on Congo[2]. The report covers the most serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law committed in Congo between March 1993 and June 2003 that also shaded some light on how President Kagame’s led regime was implicated in most of those tragic events. Our organizations along with many other Human Rights organizations have urged the United Nations members with US leadership to make a concerted international effort to initiate judicial investigations into grave human rights violations in the Democratic Republic of Congo documented by the UN and bring those responsible to justice.

As Human Rights Watch (HRW) stated in its today’s Council of June 7th, 2011 titled “Rwanda: Serious Concerns Regarding Freedom of Expression[3], it remains seriously concerned that freedom of expression is not respected in practice, as evidenced by these recent cases: 
  • In February 2011, Agnès Uwimana and Saidati Mukakibibi, journalists with the newspaper Umurabyo, were found guilty of endangering public order and sentenced to 17 years and 7 years respectively, in connection with articles viewed as critical of the government. Uwimana was also found guilty of minimizing the genocide, “divisionism” and defamation.
  • Bernard Ntaganda, leader of the opposition party P.S.-Imberakuri, was sentenced to four years' imprisonment in February 2011 for endangering national security and “divisionism”, in connection with his statements criticizing government policies.
  • Several other members of the PS-Imberakuri and the FDU-Inkingi opposition parties, including FDU-Inkingi leader Victoire Ingabire, remain in detention.
  • To HRW knowledge, there has been no progress in the investigation into the murder of Democratic Green Party Vice-President André Kagwa Rwisereka in July 2010.
In addition, President Kagame has expanded his terrorist activities abroad where assassination of any critic voices has been reported. As recent as last month, U.K. police warned two Rwandans in exile of evidence that they may be assassinated by the government of Rwanda[4]. One recalls that in June 2010, Lt General Kayumba Nyamwasa, former close aide to Kagame and High Commissioner of Rwanda to India, now living in exile in South Africa, was victim of an assassination attempt in Johannesburg[5]. South Africa authorities suspected the involvement of the government of Rwanda and since then has recalled his Ambassador to Rwanda. The list of critics to President Kagame who have been assassinated abroad is long, it includes Seth Sendashonga, former Minister of Interior in post genocide government assassinated in Nairobi, Kenya in 1998, Col. Theoneste Lizinde, a RPF officer who has just fled Kagame regime was killed in Nairobi, Kenya the same year of 1998[6]. It is feared that these Kagame criminal activities towards his political opponents and critics are now in high gear mode as shown by recent activities in UK and that he may be using venue in Chicago on June 10-11, 2011 as a launching pad of the same criminal activities in North American, where American and Canadian citizens will be harmed.

We have been strongly disappointed to see how President Kagame and his RPF-led government have cynically been levering genocide as a tool used for covering some leaders and protégé’s with a mantle of impunity and for monopolizing power by capturing by force state institutions and by delegitimizing, disarming and silencing dissent voices. They skillfully exploited the guilt and debt of the international community, which means that, with genocide, international community has lost the right to ask ‘awkward’ question of President Paul Kagame and his government’s agenda.

Against this deceitful background and in response to the sheer complexity of the post-genocide challenges and the incapacity of the international community to bring down the conflict potential, we believe that time has come to break the siege of silence and give Rwandans a chance to sit down, talk openly about their tragedy and forge a common vision to shape their future as did the American people three centuries ago. This is why we strongly believe that time has come to take a bold step with courage and engage Rwandans of all walks of life in a genuine process of sincere Dialogue, Truth and Reconciliation in order to break away from the longstanding cycle of violence and impunity and to pave the way for a lasting solution.

We believe you have the potential and good will to help Rwandans bring out the best of themselves and overcome the culture of fear and despair, get rid of politics of warlordism and ethno-centric tyranny as your predecessors did in Europe a half-century ago. Above all, we believe you have the potential and good will to restore hope and America’s image in Rwanda and in the Great Lakes region of Africa. We believe that we can speak on behalf of a great many voiceless Rwandans if we tell you that Rwandan people as a whole expect from your administration policy a strong support to their hope to see sincere and inclusive dialogue about the past and the future of their country prevail over the longstanding culture of repression and the cycle of violence and humanitarian crisis it brings about.

Once again, we thank you Excellency Mr. President for all efforts you deployed in an attempt to make a positive difference in Rwanda and request your considerations in assisting us in sparing future tragedy and give the next Rwandan generations the prospect of living in harmony with a lasting peace. Your critical support can mostly be achieved by asking President Kagame to do the right thing and open a roadmap of a genuine democratic process and dialogue and only until then can he be welcomed on the US soil for either private or official visits.  In hope to hear from you soon, we wish you a productive trip and thank you for your understanding and cooperation.


Sincerely,

For the Rwandese Community
                   Pascal Kalinganire


Honorable Hillary Clinton
Secretary of State
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520
    
Honorable Governor Pat Quinn
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, 16-100
Chicago, IL 60601
Phone: 312-814-2121

Honorable Rahm Emanuel
Mayor of City of Chicago
121 N La Salle St
Chicago City Hall 4th Floor
Chicago, IL 60602




List of Civil Society and Political Organizations for this initiative.

Mr. Félicien NDINDABAHIZI                                   Mr. Jean-Marie Vianney Ndagijimana
CERCI –Cote D’Ivoire (se)                                        FEIDAR-France (se)

Mr. Théobald Gakwaya Rwaka                                  Mr. Raphael Rwambonera
CNR-Switzerland (se)                                                RFIEKU-Suede (se)

Mr. Gerard Karangwa Semushi                                   Mme. Agnes Mukarugomwa
PDP-Imanzi  Netherlands (se)                         Dialogue & Convivialité – Belgium (se)

Théobald RUTIHUNZA                                             Mr. Eustache Habumuremyi
RIPRODHOR (se)                                                     Jambo-Belgium (se)

Mr. Léon Ngarukiye                                                   Mr. Joseph Matata
Amical-Rwandais  Danermark (se)                              CLIIR-Belgium (se)

Mr. Jean-Baptiste Ngarambe                                      Mme. Daphrose Nyirankundwankize
HRRF-Belgium (se)                                                    RIFDP-Belgium/Canada/Netherlands (se)

Mr. Jean-Paul Mihigo                                                 Mr. Gilbert NIZEYIMANA
RAYA-USA (se)                                                        CORWABEL-Belgium (se)

Mr. Pacifique Kabalisa                                    Mr. Pierre-Claver Nkinamubanzi                    
CPCH-Belgium (se)                                                    CRC-Canada (se)

Mr. Elysee Ndayisaba                                                 Mr. Theophile Murengerantwari          
AVICA-Belgium (se)                                                  MDPR-Intiganda  Germany (se)                                            
Mr. Etienne Mutabazi                                                  Mr. Jean-Paul Rwasamanzi
RDTJ-South Africa (se)                                              AKAGERA-RHEIN  Germany (se)                           
Mr. Ildephonse Murengezi                                          
UMUNTU-Switzerland (se)                                        

Mr. Callixte Kanani                                                     Mme. Marthe-Antoinette Balihe
CRES-Switzerland (se)                                               ARL-Luxemburg (se)

Mr. Jean-Damascene Rugomboka                              Mr. Pascal Kalinganire
CARP-Netherlands (se)                                              OPJDR-USA (se)
                                                                                 
Mr. Jean-Marie Vianney Ndagijimana
COVIGLA Collectif des victimes des crimes de masse
commis dans la région des grands lacs africains
France (se)
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Paul Kagame: 17 years of flawed policy of reconciliation between Hutus and Tutsis

President George W. Bush welcomes President Pa...Kagame and Bush
By the Rising Continent Blog
Since 1994, the Rwandan government has requested and received billions of dollars to rebuild the country. Because of what had happened then, there was little left to bring back some sort of togetherness between Hutus and Tutsis. Paul Kagame, Rwandan president, playing on the guilt of the international community, has used the funds he got to pursue his own agendas. But officially he and his representatives go out explaining to the world that the money was being used effectively to develop the country and particularly reconcile the Rwandan communities. The famous Gacaca courts, Ingando programs, ongoing Intore initiatives and Rwandan Diaspora communities, have been all claimed to have been developed and funded in that official policy of reconciliation.
However, recent events related to Rwandan government terrorist activities in UK against Kagame’s opponents have demonstrated that almost all the funding has contributed and continues to reinforce an apartheid sort of regime in Rwanda where Tutsis are the White South Africans of the past, and Hutus, even less considered than the Black South Africans of the segregation era.  On May 26th, 2011, Ruhumuza Mbonyumutwa wrote in Jambonews online news site an article which highlights to the point how Paul Kagame has so far been lying to everyone about the Rwandan reconciliation. The majority of Rwandan was already aware of such lies. But the international community were not as spot on as it appears today about these monstrous lies. I have translated from French and reproduced the mentioned article below, as nothing can be as explanatory as its author narrates the facts and related story.
London: meeting with a controversial Rwandan woman

For almost a month, the news in the Rwandan Diaspora is dominated by reports from London saying that the Rwanda government is harassing several Rwandan-British living there and has even planned to eliminate some of them.
But who are these individuals disturbing Kigali, what is their background, why do they bring concern, what do they want?
Young Hutu refugees who fled RPF atrocities, Tutsi woman survivor of the genocide of 1994, men and women who fought in the ranks of the RPF, their profiles are diverse but what they share in common is the fact that they regularly participate together to activities organized by an association called ‘PAX,’ of which the latest was a commemoration held on April 19th, 2011 and has particularly disturbed the regime in Rwanda.
To better understand this association, Jambonews met Prudentienne Seward, president and co-founder, and whose story symbolizes the complexity of the Rwandan tragedy and has inspired the creation of the organisation.
Prudentienne was born in Rwanda in the early 60′s from a Tutsi father and a mother half Hutu, half Tutsi, which in the Rwandan tradition makes her considered entirely as Tutsi since children belong culturally to the ethnic group of their father.
With a nostalgic smile she tells us how people lived in harmony. She even gives us an example of the annual tradition of ‘Ubudehe’ held in each September and which aimed at bringing together the entire neighborhood to come and help harvesting ‘amasaka’ [sorghum].
For those with large farms, as was the case for her family, they invited all the neighbors to come and help cultivate a field, and then shared together ‘Ikigage’ [sorghum beer] offered by the farm owner to thank everyone for participating. Hutu or Tutsi, it did not matter. The whole neighborhood contributed together joyfully.
When the RPF launched its war on October 1st, 1990, inter-communities’ relations within the population didn’t change much except the fact that on the streets, ‘I was more often asked to produce my ID document.’
On April 6, 1994 when President Habyarimana’s plane was shot down, Prudentienne was in Butare [Southern Rwanda] and that same evening there was panic, ‘everyone had to stay home.’

From April 6th to 21st, 1994, she tells us that in Butare, roadblocks were put up and managed together by both Hutu and Tutsi [this was almost the picture everywhere including in Kigali, the Rwandan capital], who feared that members of the CDR [extremist Hutus] would come to kill Hutu from the South and members of the PSD party.
She tells us that it was on April 21st that systematic massacres targeting Tutsis began, this following a speech [on radio] by the Acting Rwandan President Theodore Sindikubwabo. She says that in retrospect, she questioned the existence of a planning of the killing, because as she explains ‘people were likely encouraged at the last minute, from 21st April onwards.’
Since then on, she felt threatened and feared that at any time, Interahamwe militiamen could come and kill her. It was the mayor of her local authority Nyaruhengeri, Kabeza Charles who saved her life. She adds that her savior was later on killed by RPF soldiers in DRCongo, some years after.
On June 24th, 1994, through Oxfam, at the association ‘Terre Des Hommes’ and especially Chris, her husband, a British citizen, she was able to be evacuated to] Burundi [neighboring country] with a group of foreigners. While in Burundi, she learns that her whole family on the side of her father and her nieces were massacred by Interahamwe.
In August 1994, after RPF seized power, Prudentienne decides to return to Rwanda to find out about her mother and sister. Believing that peace had returned, she encountered instead delusion. ‘when I thought I would find restored peace, I saw horrible things: RPF was busy putting people in camps; everywhere I went, you could come across strong smell of dead bodies and on our way, men were being systematically slaughtered. ‘
She manages to get back to her hometown expecting to find her relatives. She only finds ruins and desolation. ‘Interahamwe had destroyed our house,’ she explains.
It is when she is seeking to find where her mother could be that a local man tells her that her mother, sister and aunt had been killed by RPF a few days before.’ As soon as that man had just explained me what had happened to my family, an RPF soldier who overheard us came and shouted to the man.‘ He told the man, ‘We came to save you now you are saying you were being killed!‘ The soldier shot dead the man before Prudentienne’s eyes straightaway.
Chris, my husband, who was present at the scene then said angrily, ‘you’re supposed to be the saviors of the people and you are about to massacre them?’ Then the RPF soldier explained immediately why her family was killed.  ‘Your mother was killed because she was an Interahamwe, we don’t kill normal people (abantu bazima).
Having heard her husband speak French, the soldiers became restless, screaming, ‘He is French’ and in a panic, they [Prudentienne and her husband] urgently got in their car and drove away speedily. ‘We were pursued by a jeep with soldiers shutting on us. Luckily we managed to escape them,’ she explains.
They fled Rwanda and went to live in Angola, where her husband had been appointed deputy representative of Oxfam. In 1995, Prudentienne decided to return to Rwanda in order to bury with dignity her loved ones. Just starting from the airport, she began to be worried. Officials asked her all sorts of questions, such as, ‘how did you survive?’’Is your family still alive?’One official highlighting the fact that she had a passport which was issued in June 1994, exclaimed, ‘if you survived it’s because you’re Interahamwe.’
At the end of negotiating with the officials, she manages to enter the country without much more trouble. As soon she had buried her mother, she left immediately Rwanda.
On April 3rd, 1996 while in Angola, her husband is killed, ‘caught in an ambush that targeted UN soldiers with whom he was.’

It’s on April 6th, 1996, that she arrived in England where she now lives with her husband’s family which hosted her.
Just after her arrival in England, she was approached by a group of Rwandans who had heard her story and asked her to be part of an association of Tutsi survivors to testify about her traumatic experience.
They wanted me to give testimonies regularly, and I agreed but I told them that my mother had been killed by the RPF, aspect of my story they told me that I was not allowed to speak about, [according to RPF] it was an accident, which had been caused by young RPF soldiers who had come back in the country and found their families slaughtered by Interahamwe.’ She then told them that in that case she couldn’t continue testifying, ‘no one can stop me from talking about all the loved ones I have lost.’
There she realized the seriousness of the problem of memory in the Rwandan tragedy, ‘I didn’t want to see the genocide be used to divide further Rwandans, I didn’t want my story to serve as a means to oppress other victims of our common tragedy.’
It was after that, in 1998, she made contact with Rene Claudel Mugenzi [living then in London] and together with other Rwandans, they founded PAX, an initiative which aims to promote peace, justice, forgiveness and reconciliation between peoples of the Great Lakes. About Rwanda particularly, she found that many associations were often mono-ethnic and PAX wanted from the beginning to be wholly inclusive, bringing together all ethnic groups. PAX regularly organizes conferences on reconciliation, and commemoration of all the victims of Rwandan tragedies.
She believes that the biggest problem in Rwanda is the lack of justice. ‘There are a lot of talks on The Mapping Report while nothing is bringing enough attention to the killings that RPF committed inside Rwanda.
What is most revolting for her is that, ‘there is a significant part of the victims who are silenced, have no rights at all to remember or refer to their dead and this has to stop, because with the current situation there cannot be any effective and genuine reconciliation.’
Since she began running PAX, the Rwandan High Commission in London has tried every trick to recruit her. ‘At first it was seduction. They would explain me how it would be a good option to work with them, but when I persistently refused, they became more threatening.’
The commemoration held on April 19th seems to have particularly offended the regime. It aimed at remembering and honoring ‘all the victims of the genocide in Rwanda and all other atrocities that have affected Rwanda since 1959.
What particularly upset many pro-Rwandan regime’s who called her [referring to the event] was one sentence in the invitation that said ‘the survivors (Hutu and Tutsi), will give testimonies and share their different experiences so that everyone could understand other people’s pain and therefore they could all move towards forgiveness and reconciliation.’
Since sending out the invitation which equally went to the Rwandan High Commission, many Rwandans sided with the regime in Kigali called her to say that ‘it was really incorrect and inappropriate to talk of Hutu survivors.’

The event took place peacefully without any incident and was reported by BBC Gahuza Miryango. Hutu and Tutsi listened alternatively to each other experiences and personal stories.
After the testimony of Prudentienne, a former RPF soldier, Noble Marara, who was a bodyguard of Paul Kagame, spoke and apologized ‘for having been part of a group that brought you so much suffering,’ before he hug her under the cheers of all other participants emotionally touched.
Hutu, Tutsi and former RPF soldiers had each individually the opportunity to testify, to tell their story with the aim of enabling everyone to better understand the other.
Since that event, threats intensified. She received multiple telephone calls treating her as Interahamwe and saying that whatever the means to be used, RPF was going to use them to stop her project.
Within three weeks from the event she heard that Rene Claudel’s life was also in danger, ‘I was angry, I wondered how they could get to such madness’ and when we asked her if she was afraid of dying, her response was as immediate as spontaneous, ‘Ntawatinya gupfa, urupfu yararurenze’ [You can not be afraid of dying when you have passed the stage of death]
Prudentienne is the kind of woman whose story gives every excuse to fall into hatred, and yet day after day advocates for peace and forgiveness.
In its virulent response that the Rwandan government has so far provided to deny the threats of harassment [which have been published in most of mainstream media], one persistent argument emerges: why does it attack now Rwandan citizens ‘not so well known’?
RPF government is an ethnocentric and racist regime which has been responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of Hutu but also an unknown number of Tutsi. The movement draws its legitimacy from the international recognition of the genocide that was perpetrated in 1994 against the Tutsi minority. Once an international partner evokes the slightest criticism about violations of human rights or crimes committed by RPF, the answer is straightforward as noted Theogene Rudasingwa, former chief of staff of Paul Kagame, ‘Where were you during the genocide against Tutsi?’ Intimidated and unanswered, international partners get silent immediately and move to other topics on the agenda.
From a standpoint of Rwandan society, the regime in Rwanda attacks with greater virulence anyone who dares to refer to his victims. ‘Genocidaires, Interahamwe, Negationists, supporters of the genocide, Useless people,’ this is the list of names [insults] given daily to any Rwandan citizen or foreigner, whatever their background, who dares to mention crimes that RPF committed.
The most cynical attacks are those directed at Tutsi survivors, such as Prudentienne who is called ‘Interahamwe’ or Déo Mushayidi [imprisoned Tutsi and leader of a non registered opposition party] who lost almost his entire family in the genocide of 1994 and for whom the Rwandan prosecutor requested a conviction for ‘negationism.’
Projects bringing together Hutu and Tutsi which aim at a genuine reconciliation represent for the Rwandan regime a serious menace, considered the narrative of the country’s recent history that it has imposed and which constitutes its raison d’être.
It’s only by dividing the Rwandan society into two camps and by stigmatizing its opponents but also more generally calling the entire Hutu community genocidaires that the regime can maintain this version of history.
Any lasting peace in Rwanda, in order to be free from any foreseeable bloody conflict, demands however a genuine reconciliation between Rwandans. It requires the recognition of all victims, justice for all, but also and perhaps above all truth about the causes of the tragedy that befelt the entire Rwandan population. Yet so far the regime refuses to take this path for fear that senior RPF executives could become accountable  for their crimes.
It is for these reasons, more than the various groups in the political arena of opposition parties with their ongoing and futile bickering, that associations such as PAX are considered by the Rwandan government as a threat that must be annihilated at any price, because they endanger seriously the very foundations of the regime.
What the story tells about Rwanda since October 1st, 1990, RPF’s ideology and Paul Kagame’s regime
Since the RPF’s attack of Rwanda in October 1990, rightly considered to be led by ex-Tutsi refugees, and because of a plural political party system which had started but unfortunately developed in the middle of a context of civil war, certain animosities had flourished among different sections of the Rwandan community.
From the early days of the RPF guerrilla war in January 1991, the presence of the French on the side of Hutus was a persistent obstacle because they were in the way of Kagame’s evil plans for Hutus until they left after the ‘Turquoise Operation’ in September 1994.
Prudentienne’s mother was half Hutu, consequently, according to RPF ideology that the soldier who confronted her interlocutor applied, she was Interahamwe and not a normal person. Therefore she could be killed and she was. At some extent, normal people would appear here to be only Tutsis. Hutus are all interahamwe, and if they cannot be killed all at once, they cannot be treated by the Rwandan government as normal people. And that’s what has been happening all these last seventeen years of Paul Kagame’s leadership in the country.
Because RPF political ideology is so extremist towards Hutus, it cannot be sold to the international public as it is. Otherwise it would be openly decried, as was the South African apartheid. The regime uses then appealing terminologies such as reconciliation, community work, etc for its discriminative policies.
If you are Hutu, you are not allowed to talk officially i.e. publically of the loved ones you lost during the genocide or any other time or anywhere because of RPF. This happened to Prudentienne. It happened to Rwandans through Umubano community group who in 2006 were remembering during a public event in London what had happened to their compatriots in Tingi-Tingi [ex-Zaire]. Four of their colleagues were imprisoned four months later because Kigali had accused them officially as genocidaires and requested from the UK their extradition. It also happened to Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, leader of FDU-Inkingi, because she publicly questioned the reason Hutus who died during the genocide had nowhere to be remembered. She is in prison in Kigali since October 14th, 2010. The rest of the Hutu population has to shut their conscience about their dead in order to survive under Kagame’s regime. Unfortunately, it is not only about their dead, but all fundamental human rights.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Governor Cuomo Suspends New York’s Participation In DHS Secure Communities Program

BREAKING: Governor Cuomo Suspends New York’s Participation In DHS Secure Communities Program

Governor CuomoToday, Governor Andrew Cuomo (D) announced that New York will “suspend” its participation in the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) controversial Secure Communities program.
The Secure Communities program is supposed to catch and deport undocumented immigrants convicted of serious crimes. It’s a program that we could support if only it accomplished its intended goal, which it doesn’t.
So amid mounting evidence that the program does more harm than good, Gov. Cuomo decided to reevaluate the value of the program for his state. Via the press release from Governor Cuomo's office:
"There are concerns about the implementation of the program as well as its impact on families, immigrant communities and law enforcement in New York," Governor Cuomo said. "As a result, New York is suspending its participation in the program."
In a letter to DHS, Governor Cuomo's administration stated that information produced thus far has called into question – at both the federal and state levels – the implementation and intended effect of the Secure Communities program.
Governor Cuomo's office has also received complaints stating that the goals of the program were not being met. The questions raised are further aggravated by inconsistent statements by DHS and a failure to disclose basic information about the program.
The decision by the Governor received support from a strong contigent of law enforcement professionals from across New York, including the New York State Police Benevolent Association, the New York State Association of Chiefs of Police and the New York State Sheriffs Association.
You can read a copy of the letter from Counsel to the Governor, Mylan Denerstein, to the Department of Homeland Security here.
It’s clear that the Secure Communities program is unpopular, harmful, and ineffective. According to Salt Lake City Police Chief, Chris Burbank:
The Secure Communities program combined with misguided state legislation has promoted a shift in local law enforcement's mission across the country and driven a wedge between the police and public. The resulting priority adjustment places emphasis upon civil immigration action over community policing and all criminal enforcement. The conceit of the program is its intention to target serious criminal offenders. Unfortunately, community members and traffic violators are often more significantly impacted than violent offenders. We in law enforcement must safeguard community trust. Without the support and participation of the neighborhoods in which we serve, we cannot provide adequate public safety and maintain the well-being of our nation. As Governor Cuomo appropriately asserts, the Secure Communities program has not had its intended effect and we have experienced more negative than positive.
So far, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn (D), has decided to pull out of the program, and Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) has called for an investigation into questionable ICE practices regarding the program. (Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) publicly supported her.) Then, last month, law enforcement leaders and elected officials held a telephonic press conference sharing their concerns about Secure Communities. Even the Sheriff of San Francisco, Michael Hennessey, was moved enough to write an article in the Huffington Post speaking out against it.
Last week’s blow came when California Assembly Member Tom Ammiano introduced the TRUST Act – legislation that would allow counties in California to opt out of the program.  According to DHS, counties in California would have to adhere to California’s Secure Communities agreement whether they want to or not. The TRUST Act passed the California Assembly by a 43-22 vote, and the bill now heads to the California Senate.
The pressure is clearly on DHS to either fix the program -- or scrap it altogether
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Rwanda's Bad Press: Police Report State Assassins on British Soil

KPFA Radio News, 05.29.2011: British and U.S. reactions to Scotland Yard's report of Rwandan state assassins on British soil.
Transcript: 
Click Here to Watch the BBC Video about Kagame hitman in UK
KPFA Weekend News Anchor Anthony Fest:  And in news from Southeastern Africa, the BBC reported this month that British Police had contacted two Rwandan exiles living in London to say that they were in danger of being assassinated by agents of the Rwandan government.  KPFA's Ann Garrison has the story.

KPFA/Ann Garrison:  BBC Newsline reported the London Metropolitan Police warning to two Rwandans living in London during the third week of May.

BBC Newsline:  The Metropolitan Police have taken the extraordinary step of warning two British citizens from Rwanda, living in London, that they’re at risk of being assassinated by the Rwandan government.  Legal notices were sent to a former Lib Dem candidate, Rene Mugenzi, and Jonathan Musonera.  We’ve spoken with both men.  Now it’s understood that a Rwandan suspected of being part of the plot against the exiles was prevented from entering Britain last week.

KPFA:  Mugenzi went to Amnesty International last year with evidence that Rwandan President Paul Kagame’s Rwandan Patriotic Army was guilty of massacring 8,000 Rwandan Hutu people in an Internally Displaced Persons, or IDP, Camp in Southwestern Rwanda, in 1995, while UN peacekeepers stood by.  Their allegations add to the body of evidence challenging the official Rwandan government history of the Rwanda Genocide and its aftermath.
BBC Newsnight
BBC Newsline’s host asked British MP Malcolm Bruce, Chair of British Parliament’s International Development Select Committee how he could continue to justify the British government’s plan to extend another $83 million pounds in aid to Rwanda:

BBC Newsline Host:  We heard from the commentator there that there’s worsening repression, that rivals have been killed, that there’s a climate of fear, and we continue to give $83 billion pounds of aid to this country.   Can we justify that?

KPFA:  Rwandan are refugees and exiles in the U.S. repeated the same question, as did their Congolese refugees and exiles, who hold Rwandan President Paul Kagame and his Rwandan Patriotic Front regime responsible for invading, occupying, and plundering the resource rich eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, in the ongoing conflict that has cost upwards of six million lives since 1996.

The U.S. is, like Britain, a major donor to Rwanda, one of its principle military partners on the African continent.
Rwandan American Law Professor Charles Kambanda
St. John’s University Law Professor Charles Kambanda, a Rwandan dissident, exile, and former member of the Rwandan Patriotic Front, says that the Rwandan Army is the most influential institution in Rwanda, that most of its top officers are trained by the U.S., and that the U.S., as the “brain of the Rwandan army,” will bear primariy responsibility for whatever happens next in that country.
For Pacifica, KPFA and AfrobeatRadio, I'm Ann Garrison.
(See the BBC Newsline report at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zXN4eZO2_g .)
Enhanced by Zemanta