Africa Great Lakes Democracy Watch



Welcome to
Africa Great Lakes Democracy Watch Blog. Our objective is to promote the institutions of democracy,social justice,Human Rights,Peace, Freedom of Expression, and Respect to humanity in Rwanda,Uganda,DR Congo, Burundi,Sudan, Tanzania, Kenya,Ethiopia, and Somalia. We strongly believe that Africa will develop if only our presidents stop being rulers of men and become leaders of citizens. We support Breaking the Silence Campaign for DR Congo since we believe the democracy in Rwanda means peace in DRC. Follow this link to learn more about the origin of the war in both Rwanda and DR Congo:http://www.rwandadocumentsproject.net/gsdl/cgi-bin/library


Showing posts with label DRC-UN MAPPING REPORT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DRC-UN MAPPING REPORT. Show all posts

Friday, March 11, 2011

House Africa Subcommittee Hearing on DRC Urges the Appointment of a Special Envoy to the Africa’s Great Lakes

DRC, orthographic projection.Image via Wikipedia
Attention: open in a new window.
Yesterday, the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, and Human Rights held a hearing on the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).  Africa Faith and Justice Network (AFJN) thanks the subcommittee for its interest in DRC issues.  AFJN expressed its concerns to the subcommittee about the absence of a Congolese on the panel, but was please to hear Subcommittee chairman, Representative Christopher H. Smith (R-NJ), mention in his opening remarks that they had invited a Congolese citizen, but he was unable to attend.   Other Congolese had contacted the subcommittee with the same concern and have suggested that the subcommittee find a replacement in the Congolese diaspora, which has numerous qualified people to speak to the issues that Congo has faced and still facing today.  It is our belief that there can be no solution to Congo’s problems without the Congolese.  Click here to watch the hearing  
The hearing underscored, among other things, the importance for the Obama administration to appoint a special envoy to the region as it is stipulated in the US Public Law 109-456 , Democratic republic of the Congo relief, Security and Democracy Promotion Act of 2006, a bill which was spearheaded by then Senator Obama and signed into law by president George W. Bush in December 2006.  Click here to read the law.  It is surprising that now President Obama is unable to implement the law he authored.   We hope that with renewed effort by advocacy groups, AFJN among them, this law will not expire before it is implemented.
Africa Faith and Justice Network submitted questions to the members of congress, some of them members of the Africa subcommittee, ahead of the hearing and only two (numbers 4 and 6) were referenced to during the hearing.
The questions that were not asked or refered to either by the panel or members who attended the hearing aimed to highlight the pertinent issue of justice in Congo and the Great Lakes in general as the basis for lasting peace and prosperity.   These question are about the  UN report released on October 1, 2010, a “ Mapping Exercise documenting the most serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law committed within the territory of the Democratic Republic of the Congo between March 1993 and June 2003.”  Click here to read the submitted questions.
The crimes detailed in this report implicate, among others, nations of Africa’s Great Lakes and neighbor to DRC, Rwanda, Burundi and Uganda.   Obviously, the culture of impunity has prevented many countries in Africa and the Great Lakes in particular from advancing in any area of development and governance.   We believe that the UN mapping report which is the key focus of the questions we submitted will not become another achieve, but a opportunity for the region and the Congo in particular to end impunity and establish the rule of law.
Recently, the Congolese diaspora met at the Department of State with the US ambassador to DRC Mr. to discuss some policy priorities.   The UN report was part of their talking points.  Click here to read them. 
Also, On March 2, 2011, on Capitol Hill,  in the House of the Representatives, the African Great Lakes Advocacy Coalition, of which AFJN is a member held a congressional briefing  to highlight the UN Mapping Report.   Please click here to learn more about the event and here to view the photo gallery.
To this day, Congo is a battleground for superpowers that only desire its resources and care not about its people.   The time for Congo to be a partner with whoever wishes to do business with its people is overdue.
Please join the Africa Faith of Justice Network E-network to help in our effort towards a peaceful, prosperous, free and independent Congo. Click here to join today.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, February 28, 2011

Corporations Reaping Millions as Congo Suffers Deadliest Conflict Since World War II

FROM DEMOCRACY NOW
A new mortality report from the International Rescue Committee says that as many as 5.4 million people have died from war-related causes in the Congo since 1998. A staggering 45,000 people continue to die each month, both from the conflict and the related humanitarian crisis. Amidst the deadliest conflict since World War II, hundreds of international corporations have reaped enormous profits from extracting and processing Congolese minerals. We speak to Maurice Carney of Friends of the Congo and Nita Evele of Congo Global Action. [includes rush transcript]
Guests:
Maurice Carney, Co-Founder and Executive Director of Friends of the Congo, an advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C.
Nita Evele, Co-Chair of Congo Global Action, a coalition of human rights, humanitarian and other organizations advocating for justice in the DRC.

Rush Transcript

This transcript is available free of charge. However, donations help us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
Donate - $25, $50, $100, More...
AMY GOODMAN: The conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo is often called the “Forgotten War,” even though it’s the deadliest since World War II. A new mortality report from the International Rescue Committee says the death rate in the Congo remains as high today as it was during the brutal war that officially ended in 2003. The mortality survey found as many as 5.4 million people have died from war-related causes in the Congo since 1998. A staggering 45,000 people continue to die each month both from the conflict and the related humanitarian crisis, despite the presence of the largest United Nations peacekeeping force and billions of dollars in international aid.

Meanwhile, a US- and European Union-mediated ceasefire deal between the Congolese government and rival rebel factions in the east of the country has threatened to fall apart Tuesday, the deal announced Monday in the war-torn and diamond-rich North Kivu province. But Tutsi rebels from General Laurent Nkunda’s National Council for Defense of the People, or CNDP, refused to accept the ceasefire. They said the government is not doing enough to protect the Tutsi minority in eastern Congo from Rwandan Hutu militias, known as the FDLR, or Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda.

    RENE BANDI: For us, the problem of FDLR is the main problem. If that problem is apart, it’s not integrated in a global solution, I think there will be problems.

AMY GOODMAN: That was a spokesperson for the CNDP led by General Laurent Nkunda, who is wanted by the Congolese government for war crimes. Some reports indicate the talks broke down over whether or not to grant Nkunda amnesty. The representative of the Mai Mai rebel group, a Congolese militia that’s been fighting Nkunda’s forces in eastern Congo, also threatened to pull out of the agreement Tuesday.

    MAI MAI REPRESENTATIVE: We are very concerned, because we are looking for peace and we are ready to do peace, to make peace take place in our region. We are very tired with fighting. So if the CNDP doesn’t accept, doesn’t agree to send the documents, it means he needs to continue fighting against our population. And as we said, we always said and everybody know, we are just defending. We are protecting our population. As long as the CNDP should continue to reject the agreement that we need to sign, it means he needs to continue fighting. And we are ready to protect our population against any attacks, any aggression, which can come from them.

AMY GOODMAN: Over one million civilians have been displaced from the war-ravaged North and South Kivu provinces to escape fighting between government soldiers, Mai Mai militia and Tutsi rebels loyal to General Nkunda. Deo Bolingo is one of the many displaced people from this region, desperate for the peace deal to be implemented.

    DEO BOLINGO: [translated] All my hopes are in this conference. They should end the war. But if they cannot end it, at this point even old people, children, mothers and youth—the entire population, everyone—should be given a gun, so that everyone should know that they are dying for their lives.

AMY GOODMAN: Although war, poverty, malnutrition and disease continue to stalk the lives of millions of Congolese, the Democratic Republic of Congo also has some of the world’s richest deposits of mineral wealth. As a result, hundreds of international corporations have reaped enormous profits from extracting and processing Congolese minerals.

In June 2007, the Congolese government initiated a process to review sixty-one mining contracts established during the war in the so-called transitional period from 2003 to 2006. The review is complete, but the government has yet to publish the results. When a Congolese newspaper published in November what it claimed were leaked results of the review, several publicly traded mining stocks in the New York, London and Toronto exchanges plummeted. The leaked report indicates that the contracts could be renegotiated or even cancelled.

Maurice Carney is with us in Washington, co-founder and executive director of Friends of the Congo, an advocacy group that seeks to raise awareness about the crisis in the Congo. Nita Evele is a Congolese activist and co-chair of Congo Global Action, a coalition of humanitarian, human rights and other groups advocating for justice in the Congo. Maurice Carney and Nita Evele join us from Washington, D.C.

Can you, Nita, lay out the crisis right now on the ground?

NITA EVELE: OK. Good morning, Amy, and thank you for having us. The crisis on the ground is that the rebel group of Nkunda and the Mai Mai and all those people attack the population in villages. And right now we have almost 800,000 people displaced in the Congo. They were fleeing the conflicts between the army of FRDC—I mean, the Congolese army, who are fighting the militia of General Nkunda. So there’s a big crisis, and people are suffering on camps without food and water. Kids are dying of cholera and other diseases.

AMY GOODMAN: Maurice Carney, the International Rescue Committee calls this the worst conflict since World War II. You’ve written extensively about the involvement of multinational corporations in fueling the unrest. Can you talk about this?

MAURICE CARNEY: Certainly. When you look at the Congo, you have to look at the corporate influence and everything that takes place in the Congo. When you look at the situation as it currently is, people usually talk about rape occurring at horrendous scales. However, there are basically two types of rape taking place in the Congo. One is the rape of the women and children, and the other is the rape of the land, the natural resources. And the Congo has tremendous natural resources. We’re talking about thirty percent of the world’s reserves of cobalt, ten percent of the world’s reserve of copper, eighty percent of the world’s reserve of coltan. And these multinational corporations are profiting at enormous rates while the Congolese people are suffering tremendously.

AMY GOODMAN: Which companies?

MAURICE CARNEY: Well, there are a number of companies. From 2001 to 2003, the United Nations did a report on the illegal exploitation of the natural resources of the Congo. There are a number of American companies. We have Cabot Corporation, for example, out of Boston, Massachusetts, that was named in that report. Cabot—the former CEO of Cabot Corporation is Samuel Bodman, current Secretary of Energy in the Bush administration. We have the OM Group out of Cleveland, Ohio, is another company, American company, named in the report. We also have Freeport-McMoRan, who acquired mining rights from Phelps Dodge out of Phoenix, Arizona, who have been involved in copper exploitation in the Congo. And Global Witness said the copper mines, the Tenke Fungurume mine that Freeport-McMoRan has, represents one of the richest deposits of copper in the world. However, the Congolese government and Congolese people are not benefiting from the contracts that were established and that provided Freeport-McMoRan with those resources.

We have a number of Canadian companies. Almost every Canadian prime minister since Pierre Trudeau has been involved in the mining company in the Congo. We’re talking about Joe Clark, Brian Mulroney, Jean Chretien, all of them profiting from the natural resources of the Congo while the Congolese people suffer. The reports from the Congolese government state that eighty percent of the population live on thirty cents or less a day, while you have billions of dollars going out the back door and into the pockets of mining companies.

AMY GOODMAN: Maurice Carney, you write how the $500 million investment in assuring, well, then-President Kabila’s ascendancy to power “was the beginning of the pay off for the West’s investment. It is for this reason,” you say, “that many Congolese surmised that Kabila was summoned to Washington in October 2007 because he may have strayed from the game plan when he signed a $5 billion deal with China.” Even as he ventured there, you say, to Washington, “he first had to stop in Phoenix, Arizona to visit Tim Snider (recently replaced by Richard Adkerson), CEO of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold.” Talk more about this relationship. Yes, corporations are there, but what exactly are they doing? Who are they making these deals with?

MAURICE CARNEY: Well, they’re making these deals with the Kabila government. In fact, Kabila was put in place by the Western powers because he was pliant leader. He was going to facilitate access to Congo’s vast geostrategic resources. So that’s the reason why Kabila—the main reason why Kabila was put in power. The International Crisis Group had done a study in 2007 which stated as much, where it documented that Western ambassadors were celebrating that Kabila won the elections, because they now knew that they would have the legitimate access to the natural resources of the Congo.

AMY GOODMAN: We’re talking to Maurice Carney, co-founder and executive director of Friends of the Congo, and Nita Evele, co-chair of Congo Global Action. Nita, how aware are people on the ground of these large multinational corporations and their relationship to what’s happening?

NITA EVELE: Oh, the country knows about all that. We see, since Kabila is in power, all the multinationals are there thriving. The Congolese people know about all the contract-reviewing commission. We had one in 2006 by Lutundula, who never had been publicized to the population, but it was leaked to the internet, and everybody saw how all those companies made a deal with Kabila to plunder the country. They sold MIBA, for example—MIBA is the diamond company in the Kasai—for only $14 million, while the company was making a hundred times more than that. So the country knows about what’s going on.

And usually, the people in the Congo used to do diamond—like an artisanal miners, but since those company bought all these lands, they cannot mine those lands anymore. Some villages were sold to the Russians, for example, and the people were kicked out of their land. So it’s a big mess, big, big mess. And people know about that. There are rivers who were sold to multinational company, and people cannot go take—have water to drink. So it’s something that people know about, and people are talking about it. And everybody know how those companies are benefiting and Kabila’s people are benefiting, and the country and the population are getting poorer and poorer every single day.

AMY GOODMAN: Maurice Carney, the role of the international financial institutions, like the World Bank?

MAURICE CARNEY: Yes, there’s really four entities that are involved in keeping the Congo dependent, and one of those entities are international financial institutions, multinational institutions, such as the IMF and the World Bank. In fact, Antonio Guterres had given an interview earlier in January to the Financial Times where he stated that the International Monetary Fund had set up financial rules that pretty much restrict the Congolese government. At least they prevented the Congolese government from having the necessary resources to pay its soldiers. And as a result of the government not having the resources to pay its soldiers, the soldiers then feast on the population through—by stealing, by raping. So you see how the constriction that’s put on the government by the international financial institutions feed the violence that is there in the Congo.

In addition to that, you have the World Bank, for example, which went into the Congo much in the fashion as Naomi Klein describes in her disaster capitalism: they went in after the conflict in 2002, established the mining laws, and the mining laws provided the legal framework for the multinational corporations to come in and establish contracts with the government. Now, even though the mining laws were in place and they required transparency and adherence to the OECD laws, the mining companies came in, and the contracts were opaque. They weren’t transparent. And World Bank studies clearly document this, but they have refused to publish those studies which demonstrate how the mining contracts that’s been established by multinational corporations are actually odious contracts and absolutely do not serve the interests of the Congolese people, but serve the interest of investors from the West.

AMY GOODMAN: Maurice Carney, can you talk about the foreign fighters? It’s often described as a civil war, and yet the fighters from Uganda and Rwanda, what role do they play?

MAURICE CARNEY: Right, a “civil war” is a misnomer. Congo has been invaded twice, first in 1996 primarily by Rwanda and Uganda, when they installed Kabila in power, and they did this with the backing of the United States. They could not have invaded the Congo without the backing of the United States, as Cynthia McKinney documented in her congressional hearing in 2001. Then, when Kabila did not serve the interests of the Rwandans and the Ugandans and the US, then he was gotten rid of. He was assassinated on January 16, 2001.

The Rwandans and Ugandans then invaded the Congo a second time in 1998. And it was this second invasion that the study from the IRC—it has been documented—where 5.4 million Congolese have died. Fifty percent of those Congolese are less than five years old. And the main cause of death is not so much of violent conflict, but from treatable diseases such as diarrhea and pneumonia, all diseases that can be treated. So you have basically Rwanda and Uganda playing a destructive role in the Congo.

When they established peace deals to get—to be removed from the Congo, they left proxy forces in the Congo who were controlling areas that were endowed with gold and tin and diamonds. So even though the Rwandans and Ugandans backed out, and even though they profited tremendously while the were in the Congo with their own forces, they left proxy forces in the Congo. And this started in the Clinton administration and extended into the Bush administration. And if you recall, Amy, during this time, they were saying that Kagame of Rwanda—

AMY GOODMAN: We have ten seconds, Maurice.

MAURICE CARNEY: OK. Kagame of Rwanda, Museveni of Uganda were the future leaders of Africa, and one thing they all had in common is that they’ve invaded other African countries.

AMY GOODMAN: We’re going to leave it there right now, but we will come back, because this is a critical discussion, the worst conflict since World War II. Maurice Carney, co-founder and executive director of Friends of the Congo, and Nita Evele, co-chair of Congo Global Action
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, February 25, 2011

March 2 - US Congress - Washington DC - Congressional Briefing on the UN Mapping Report about genocide in the Congo

The Coat of arms of the Democratic Republic of...Image via Wikipedia

by Kambale Musavuli on Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 1:24pm
Congressional Briefing to Address Justice and stability in the Congo and Great Lakes Region of Africa
The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNOHCHR) released the official “Report of the Mapping Exercise" in October 2010. The report documents "the most serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law committed within the territory of the Democratic Republic of the Congo between March 1993 and June 2003”. Over 200 Congolese organizations have called for the report to be addressed by the international community.

Human Rights Watch executive director, Kenneth Roth says: "If followed by strong regional and international action, this report could make a major contribution to ending the impunity that lies behind the cycle of atrocities in the Great Lakes region of Africa."

Philip J. Crowley, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Public Affairs said: “The United States is firmly committed to helping the DRC and other nations in the region take positive steps to end the corrosive cycle of violence and impunity.”

The United States has a key role to play in making sure that justice is delivered to the people of Central Africa. US tax dollars fund US allies, Rwanda and Uganda who are deeply implicated in mass atrocities, crimes against humanity, war crimes and possibly genocide in the Congo.

The American taxpayers should be assured that their tax dollars are not supporting mass atrocities in Africa and perpetuating a war, which has killed an estimated 6 million people, making it the deadliest conflict since World War II.  The Congressional briefing can serve as a first step in delivering justice to the people in the heart of Africa.

Who: African Great Lakes Advocacy Coalition (Africa Faith and Justice Network, Friends of the Congo, Foreign Policy in Focus, African Great Lakes Action Network, Hotel Rwanda Rusesabagina Foundation, Foundation for Freedom and Democracy in Rwanda, Congo Global Action Coalition, International Humanitarian Law Institute of St. Paul, Mobilization for Peace and Justice in Congo)

What: Briefing on the UN Mapping Exercise Report and its Implications for US Policy in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Region


Speakers:


Brian Endless, Hotel Rwanda Rusesabagina Foundation
Bahati Jacques, Africa Faith and Justice Network
Nita Evele, Congo Global Action Coalition
Nii Akuetteh, Africa Policy Analyst
Emira Woods, Foreign Policy in Focus at the Institute of Policy Studies

When: 2 P.M. – 4 P.M. Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Where:  Room 2226 Rayburn House Office Building (US Congress - Capitol Hill)
45 Independence Ave SW
Washington, DC 20515


RSVP: events@friendsofthecongo.org or 202-584-6512
Contacts:  Friends of the Congo
Phone:  202-584-6512

For more information, please visit www.friendsofthecongo.org or www.afjn.org
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, February 3, 2011

DRC: Mapping human rights violations 1993-2003

DRC: Mapping human rights violations 1993-2003

DRC: Mapping human rights violations 1993-2003In the wake of the discovery of three mass graves in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in late 2005, the United Nations first announced its intention to send a human rights team to conduct a mapping exercise in DRC in a June 2006 report to the Security Council.

In May 2007, the UN Secretary-General approved the terms of reference of the mapping exercise following a series of consultations among relevant UN agencies and partners and with the Congolese government
The mapping exercise, led by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) had three objectives:
  • Conduct a mapping exercise of the most serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law committed within the territory of the DRC between March 1993 and June 2003.
  • Assess the existing capacities within the national justice system to deal appropriately with such human rights violations that may be uncovered.
  • Formulate a series of options aimed at assisting the Government of the DRC in identifying appropriate transitional justice mechanisms to deal with the legacy of these violations, in terms of truth, justice, reparation and reform, taking into account ongoing efforts by the DRC authorities, as well as the support of the international community.
The mapping exercise began in July 2008. Between October 2008 and May 2009, a total of 33 staff worked on the project in the DRC (including Congolese and international human rights experts). Of these, some 20 human rights officers were deployed across the country, operating out of five field offices, to gather documents and information from witnesses to meet the three objectives defined in the terms of reference. The report was submitted to the High Commissioner for Human Rights in June 2009 for review, comments and finalisation.
The mapping team's 550-page report contains descriptions of 617 alleged violent incidents occurring in the DRC between March 1993 and June 2003. Each of these incidents points to the possible commission of gross violations of human rights and/or international humanitarian law. Each of the incidents listed is backed up by at least two independent sources identified in the report. As serious as they may be, uncorroborated incidents claimed by one single source are not included. Over 1,500 documents relating to human rights violations committed during this period were gathered and analysed with a view to establishing an initial chronology by region of the main violent incidents reported. Only incidents meeting a 'gravity threshold' set out in the methodology were considered. Field mapping teams met with over 1,280 witnesses to corroborate or invalidate the violations listed in the chronology. Information was also collected on previously undocumented crimes

 


.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Seeking Justice for the DRC Victims: UN Mapping Report of October 1, 2010

Seeking Justice for the Victims: UN Mapping Exercise Report of October 1, 2010 on the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Dear _CONGRESSPERSON__________________

We the undersigned come to you with concerns over the stability, security, justice and peace in ...the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes region in general. We want to call your attention to the recent UN mapping exercise report.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights’ Mapping Report, released on October 1, 2010, clearly exposes some of the most serious violations of human rights, international humanitarian law, war crimes and crimes against humanity in the DRC from March 1993 to June 2003. This report is not the first report that documents serious crimes in the Congo. These crimes were reported in the Previous UN reports of 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2008. The UN, human rights, humanitarian, advocacy organizations and investigative reporters have written extensively on some of the findings found in the mapping exercise report.
The evidence is overwhelming. The list of crimes is long. The crime scene is wide and every stone has yet to be turned. The raw data in the report describes the extent of the suffering, but does not match the tremendous human suffering of the victims and survivors.
The predominant appeal from the Congolese is the pursuit of Justice. Two hundred and twenty-five Congolese organizations have issued a call for justice based on the report.1 International NGOs have joined in this call for accountability, an end to the impunity and justice. Human Rights Watch says that “If followed up by strong action nationally and internationally, the report could make a critical contribution to ending impunity and breaking the cycle of violence in Congo and the wider Great Lakes region.”2 Justice and reconciliation is at the foundation of stability in the region. If justice is not delivered, there can be no lasting stability.

Unfortunately, very little has been done to stabilize the Congo and hold accountable Congo’s neighbors that have invaded and destabilized the Congo via support of proxy groups inside Congo. As recent as 2008, UN experts reported that “ It has found evidence that the Rwandan authorities have been complicit in the recruitment of soldiers, including children, have facilitated the supply of military equipment, and have sent officers and units from the Rwandan Defense Force (RDF) to the Democratic Republic of the Congo in support of CNDP.”3 Elements of the RDF still are embedded in the Congolese national army (FARDC) due to the integration of some of the rebel forces of the National Congress for the Defense of the People (CNDP). In addition, the Congolese leadership still has not done much to reform its national army, which also has been implicated in previous and the ongoing crimes.

In 2006, the US Congress passed S 2125, Public Law 109-456 which, stipulates in section 105 that “The Secretary of State is authorized to withhold assistance made available under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2125 et seq.), other than humanitarian, peacekeeping, and counterterrorism assistance, for a foreign country if the Secretary determines that the government of the foreign country is taking actions to destabilize the Democratic Republic of the Congo.”4 Regrettably, this instrument which is at the disposal of the Secretary of State, who co-sponosored S.2125, has not been utilized. Meanwhile, countries such as Sweden and Netherlands who do not have such a law (PL 109-456) on their books have withheld aid from Rwanda in an attempt to hold that country’s leaders accountable for their destabilizing of the Congo and the Great Lakes Region. This year Congress passed, as part of the “Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act” (Public Law 111-203), the Conflict Mineral Act (section 1502), which is meant to bring transparency in the international commerce of minerals from the conflict zone in the DRC. Opportunities exist in this law to hold Congo’s neighbors accountable, as they are key beneficiaries of conflict minerals.
Many instruments are at the disposal of the United States and the international community to address the instability in the Great Lakes region. The UN Mapping Exercise Report is one such tool and must not be overlooked and forgotten. Rather, it should be fully investigated with the intent of indicting and prosecuting anyone found to be responsible for any violation of international laws, humanitarian laws, war crimes, crimes against humanity, violence against women, sexual violence, violence against children, ethnic violence, looting of natural resources, and possibly crimes of genocide.
Aware of the weakness of the Congolese judicial system, the UN Mapping Exercise Report in sections III and IV discusses different ways to deliver justice, accountability, and stability for the victims and survivors. Human Rights Watch believes that a "mixed chamber"5 made of Congolese and international staff, African judges and prosecutors with relevant experience is one way to achieve justice for the victims. It is important to pay special attention to the option of transitional justice as well because Congo needs reconciliation for internal cohesion and healing which is a key factor to building a strong democracy rooted in the rule of law and human rights and unity for all.
We recommend that the United States government:
Leverage its position as the chair of the UN Security Council this month of December, to put The Mapping Exercise Report on the agenda.
Implement existing laws relative to Congo, namely the “Democratic Republic of the Congo Relief, Security, and Democracy Promotion Act of 2006”, public law 109-456, specifically appointing a special envoy to the Great Lakes region ( P.L 109-456, sect 207) and “Conflict mineral Act”, public law 111-203, section 1502.
Hold a hearing on the October 1, UN Mapping Exercise Report

Sincerely
Africa Faith and Justice Network
Friends of the Congo
Neema Corporation
Chicago Congo Coalition
Mennonite Central Committee U.S. Washington Office
Foundation for Freedom and Democracy in Rwanda

Enhanced by Zemanta