Africa Great Lakes Democracy Watch



Welcome to
Africa Great Lakes Democracy Watch Blog. Our objective is to promote the institutions of democracy,social justice,Human Rights,Peace, Freedom of Expression, and Respect to humanity in Rwanda,Uganda,DR Congo, Burundi,Sudan, Tanzania, Kenya,Ethiopia, and Somalia. We strongly believe that Africa will develop if only our presidents stop being rulers of men and become leaders of citizens. We support Breaking the Silence Campaign for DR Congo since we believe the democracy in Rwanda means peace in DRC. Follow this link to learn more about the origin of the war in both Rwanda and DR Congo:http://www.rwandadocumentsproject.net/gsdl/cgi-bin/library


Showing posts with label NLG USA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NLG USA. Show all posts

Monday, July 5, 2010

Rwanda Security Services planned to Assassinate Peter Erlinder




Rwanda Security Services planned to Assassinate Peter Erlinder


“I am a very privileged individual. have seen how it works. They [Rwandan Security Services] made STASI and KGB look like amateurs. “

These are the words that Prof Erlinder, an American lawyer who spent 21 days in notorious Rwandan dungeons told journalists with emotion bordering to tears, upon his arrival at the Dulles Airport in Washington DC Metro Area on June 21, 2010.


STASI, the German Ministry for State Security (German: Ministerium für Staatssicherheit or MfS), was the East Germany official state security service. The MfS was headquartered in East Berlin, with an extensive complex in Berlin-Lichtenberg and several smaller facilities throughout the city. Its brutal and bloody repression earned it the title of one of the most effective and repressive intelligence and secret police agencies in the World.

The old KGB (КГБ) or Komitet gosudarstvennoy bezopasnosti or Committee for State Security, was perhaps the most lethal secret police and dominated the lives of the people of the Soviet Union from 1954 to 1991.

Before the demise of the Soviet Union and the Eastern Block, the STASI and KGB names brought chill down the spine of people both in the East and the West.

Now, according the Peter Erlinder who just relived in Rwanda dungeons and torture chambers the nightmare of the communist regimes, Rwanda has mastered the torture, repression and assassination game to beat the STASI and KGB.

He affirms that, although the Rwandan intelligence services tortured him , the common people cared for him, and he owes them his life.

He also said that initially, the Rwandan security services had planned to assassinate him."My conclusion was their intent was to disappear me, not arrest me," Peter Erlider said. They had managed to list hist name on an airline manifest to fake his departure from the country the day before he was supposed to fly out of Kigali, the Rwandan capital. The idea may have been to kill him and have his body disappear or dump the body in Kenya. The fake manifest, that Rwanda authorities had meticulously distributed to the Embassies, including the US Embassy, was to allegedly serve to exculpate the Rwandan government in the disappearance or assassination of Peter Erlinder.


Peter Erlinder’s wits and second sense saved him when he declared that he needed to talk to the Embassy before any search of his room. Believing that he was in close contact with the US Embassy, the Rwandan security services allegedly put on hold their assassination plot. It is because of that instant intuition that Peter Erlinder is alive today.

©2010 AfroAmerica Network


Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Peter Erlinder arrest a blow to international law


Peter Erlinder speaks after being given bail following his detention accused of minimizing Rwanda's 1994 genocide. Photograph: Sayyid Azim/AP

Peter Erlinder, the lead defence counsel at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda arrested and detained by the Rwandan authorities, has now been released on bail. But the damage to the integrity of international criminal courts remains a very real problem.

Erlinder was arrested in Rwanda, accused of genocide denial, genocide ideology and of being a threat to national security. He had gone to Kigali to help in the defence of Victoire Ingabire, a Hutu expatriate who had recently returned to Rwanda to stand as an opposition candidate in the forthcoming presidential elections. Ingabire had herself been arrested and charged with offences of association with a terrorist group, propagating genocide ideology, negation of genocide and ethnic divisionism, all domestic crimes in Rwanda.

After an enormous amount of international pressure and the personal intervention of Hillary Clinton, Erlinder was eventually released on "humanitarian" grounds on appeal on 18th June. But the case against him continues.

Despite numerous requests, including from the Registrar of the ICTR asking for the proceedings to be dropped, the prosecution refused, stating that his release "… will not deter the prosecution as we finalise the case against Mr Erlinder. He will soon be called to defend his record of genocide denial that insults the people of Rwanda and inflames those who seek to harm us."

It is worth noting that all defendants in that ICTR trial have been acquitted of charges of conspiracy to commit genocide prior to 1994 when the then Rwandan president Habyarimana, a Hutu, and Burundi's president Ntaryamira were killed when their plane was shot down. Despite this judicial finding, and indeed the signature of Rwanda to the UN convention asserting immunity of counsel, the prosecutor emphasised that proceedings would be vigorously pursued. No charges have yet been brought.

The deluge of international support arose not only for Erlinder's personal fate, but also for the wider issue of genuine recognition of immunity of counsel. As an open letter by three legal associations including the International Criminal Bar to the secretary-general of the UN articulated it: "The arrest, by the Rwandan government, of an internationally respected criminal defense lawyer, while acting in that role, subverts orderly reconciliation and undermines the mission of the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, which has been making fundamental contributions to international peace and justice."

Inevitably, if counsel is at risk of prosecution for proper representation of a client in court, the interests of justice generally and international justice itself are severely, if not fatally, undermined.

In principle, lawyers who undertake the difficult job of representing those accused of the most serious crimes are protected from being identified with the submissions they put forward on behalf of their clients by UN and other conventions; but, in practice, this case has shown that where a country has domestic laws which criminalise deviation from the official line, lawyers are at considerable and unacceptable personal risk.

It is of further concern that Erlinder articulated the statements which form the foundation of the allegations against him outside Rwanda – and yet the Rwandan prosecutor asserts, and the court has accepted, jurisdiction.

Those now acting before the ICTR are understandably concerned about their own positions. Peter Robinson, another defence advocate, was until Friday threatened with contempt of court proceedings before the ICTR, having refused to examine a witness on behalf of his client following Erlinder's arrest. (Although they appeared from transcripts to have been instigated by Judge Byron at the ICTR, last week the judge indicated that no such proceedings had in fact been commenced).

Events had intervened. Firstly, Erlinder, although still subject to proceedings despite the calls from the ICTR itself to terminate proceedings immediately on the basis of his immunity, had been granted bail and returned to the US. Secondly, the International Association of Democratic Lawyers (an NGO with consultative status with Ecosoc and Unicef) had, with other organisations, protested at the issue of contempt proceedings in respect of lawyers appearing before the ICTR. And thirdly, it was apparent that the ongoing trials at the ICTR were going to be significantly disrupted by ongoing threats of contempt proceedings against counsel appearing before them.

Where an accused's defence requires that his counsel visits a country to seek further witnesses but he fears being arrested himself as a result of submissions made during proceedings (even if based on evidence and accepted by the tribunal), the balance and fairness of an international court is disrupted.

It is not merely the security and immunity of defence counsel that are at stake: the strength of an international court comes from equality of arms between the parties and a fair hearing by an independent judge. The loss of any one of these is detrimental to the integrity and credibility of all international tribunals and consequently to international justice.

Amanda Pinto QC is the UK's representative on the Council of the International Criminal Bar

Mrs.Ingabire Victoire thanking International Community For Rallying Behind Prof. Erlinder


Thanking International Community For Rallying Behind Prof. Erlinder


We are very pleased that Peter Erlinder, an innocent person, who has committed himself to the defense of human rights and due process of law at the expense of his own life, was released from the inhumane conditions of a Rwandan jail.

This is a result of relentless pressure on the regime.

We are impressed by the struggle of his family, ordinary citizens, friends, scholars, colleagues, civil associations, journalists, human rights bodies, U.S. congressmen and senators for the work they did around the clock. We wish to extend our sincere appreciation and gratitude to his family for courageously bearing this ordeal and doing everything possible to bring the matter to the attention of the US Government and the United Nations.

It is an open secret that his arrest was against all norms of judicial process. He cannot be held responsible for his expressed or written views in the defense of his clients. Once again the Rwandan judicial system has clearly demonstrated what the world has failed to believe for a long time--namely that there is no rule of law in Rwanda.

The UN and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) have established that the arrest and subsequent detention of Peter Erlinder were in violation of his immunity from legal process at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda where he is a lead defence council. This is raising up again serious questions on the capacity of the current regime to deal with ICTR cases or to provide fair justice to many Rwandan suspects held in different countries.

The arrest of Professor Erlinder, a citizen of the United States whose government is a major ally of the Government of Rwanda and a person whose professional rights and credentials are covered by international conventions, clearly shows how difficult if not impossible for a Rwandan to get justice in Rwanda. This is particularly difficult for any person challenging politically President Paul Kagame.

The arrest of Erlinder, my lawyer, is also deterrent against anyone who tries to defend my case.

The contradicting declarations of the government, the chief prosecutor and the police during the detention of Peter Erlinder have also highlighted how justice is done in Rwanda: fabrication of proof, intrigue, manipulative tactics and unfairness.

We are appealing to the voices that have stood for Professor Erlinder to continue to be on the side of Rwandans that Peter Erlinder has been standing and fighting for in order to get to the root causes of the Rwandan crisis.

Ms. Ingabire Umuhoza is Chair of FDU – Inkingi, opposition party in Rwanda. She remains under house arrest and barred from running for the August presidential elections


"Speaking Truth To Empower."

Prof.Peter Erlinder said: Arrest in Kigali “a nightmare”


Peter Erlinder, lead defense counsel for top genocide suspects at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), was released from a Rwandan prison on June 18th. The law professor was charged with genocide denial after questioning the official Rwandan version of the 1994 genocide. Click here to listen to the Radio Interview that Prof.Erlinder held with Chad Hartman

Erlinder was detained on May 28th while in Kigali to defend opposition presidential candidate Victoire Ingabire.

He spoke to IJT’s Hermione Gee about his detention.


The arrest was a nightmare. I was having my breakfast coffee and finishing my croissant at the pool of my hotel when six young men surrounded me and very politely said come with us. They took me to a police facility, where I was held for about three hours or so. I was not questioned very much. Then we drove back to the hotel. They had a search warrant to search my room, but I had no idea what they were looking for. Everything I could ever be accused of saying is published on the web, so I was not sure what they expected to find in my room.

Did they tell you what you were charged with?

I am being investigated for speech and thought crimes, not because of anything in the material world. Rwanda has passed so-called call genocide denial laws or genocide ideology laws and they claim there is something similar to Holocaust denial laws in Europe. I guess there are some similarities but because the way they define genocide is so broad that anyone who questions the government’s version of events during the civil war that led to them taking power is accused of either being a genocide denier or having genocide ideology and the sole accusation is enough.

What did they ask you during the interrogations?

They would take out an article that I had written - which is available on the web - read excerpts to me and ask what I meant by that, inquiring about what my positions were. Basically it was based on my public writing.

Then they started to ask questions about what had had been filed in court. For example, there’s a pending lawsuit against Kagame in Oklahoma city for the assassination of [former Rwandan President] Juvenal Habyarimana and Burundian President Ntaryamina. They quoted sections from that pleading as my crime.

And then I also quoted the indictments issued by the French judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere - who also laid the responsibility over Habyarimana’s murder at Kagame’s doorstep - and Spanish judge Morales - who had identified 350,000 Hutu victims of [Kagame’s] RPF soldiers.
The fact that I cited the indictments they issued was used as a basis to charge me with a crime. As well as my arguments at the ICTR.

Have the charges against you been dropped?
I don’t think so. In the Rwandan system these investigations can go on indefinitely. Now, the investigation can proceed. If they decide to charge me we’ll deal with it at that time. Or, if during the investigation, I am called back to provide more evidence I will keep my pledge to return.


I am a legal academic, a lawyer and not a scofflaw. I have no hesitancy defending myself on the merits in court. I would love to do that. In fact, if I had the opportunity to do that I could then introduce into the Rwandan courts all of the documents that I have already accumulated. That will mean the people of Rwanda for the first time in history will be able to see what their real history is. I am not sure if the Rwandan government is going to want that to occur. click here to read the Rwanda Document Project of Prof.Peter Erlinder which details the new revelation of how Rwanda genocide happened and the international involvement.


If it turns out that the legitimacy of the government is based on a story that is factually untrue, and if having the trial requires me to prove that its factually untrue - which I am prepared to do - it might seem to me that logic would prevail. But logic doesn’t necessarily drive these decisions.


However, it is also true that in the interim the UN and the ICTR have both concluded that everything that I am charged with is covered by the immunity that I have because of my work at the ICTR. It all derives from that. So then the effect of that immunity has to be addressed some time in the future if I am called back

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Kagame's American Political Prisoner

The story of Peter Erlinder, an American law professor and leading figure of the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, reads like a macabre thriller with an unresolved ending. He arrived to Rwanda on May 28th to help defend a jailed opposition presidential candidate, and then was promptly arrested and detained on specious charges of genocide ideology by the government of President Paul Kagame.

Since then, he has been deprived access to defense, suffered violations of due process, and subjected to treatment which led to an apparent attempted suicide, leaving him in a precarious mental state (click here to read one of the dystopic court rulings). Despite the State Department's formal request for his release and his deteriorating health condition, on Thursday Erlinder will await a ruling from Rwanda's High Court regarding the possibility of his release on bail.

Many observers with close knowledge of the case assure that the charges are entirely politically motivated, with no grounds or factual basis. "On a case like this, nothing's going to happen unless the government officials of Rwanda make a decision on their own to release him," said Erlinder's lawyer Kurt Kerns. "All the judges there are figureheads. (...) They do what they are told to do."

Peter Erlinder has not committed any crime, but rather has been jailed and persecuted for exercising his duties as a defense lawyer at the ICTR - an environment in which many of his former colleagues on both sides of the cases would attest to the intense nature of these proceedings, and the extraordinary vulnerability and risks faced by those with enough courage to take on unpopular and difficult cases. Part of his work has led him to unearth a number of legal documents from the United Nations and other official organizations, and collect them for review at the website known as the Rwanda Documents Project. Much of this evidence casts doubt on the official story of the 1994 genocide as told by the current authorities, but in no way does Erlinder's research constitute a crime.

Nevertheless, a disgusting backlash has come out against Erlinder, somehow justifying his grotesque imprisonment because these voices disagree with his political opinions. Right here on The Huffington Post, the seemingly well-intentioned genocide survivor Freddy Umutanguha misconstrues the Erlinder case and argues that "every Rwandan I know would place our right to protect our nation's peace and stability ahead of Mr. Erlinder's right to endanger them." But is that really what Erlinder was doing? Of course not. The mere suggestion that Hutus, as well as Tutsis, were systemically slaughtered - sometimes by the people currently in power - appears to be a politically inconvenient discussion that Kagame wants to conceal underneath arbitrary laws of the thought police.

Even worse still is a recent article in the Globe and Mail by Gerald Caplan, an academic with a clear axe to grind against Erlinder and his client, Victoire Ingabire. Caplan floats a variety of rumors without evidence, makes unreasonable comparisons between holocaust denial laws in Israel and genocide ideology laws in Rwanda, and even raises draconian views about their rights to defense. Some people are prone to comparing cases from true rule-of-law courts with political cases from deficient judiciaries, and it is precisely these kinds of arguments which can fuel the violence and persecution of defense council, preventing the advance of justice on the continent.

In response to Caplan's article, Alan J. Kuperman of the University of Texas wrote a letter to the editor stating: "It is Mr. Erlander's job to make that argument as a defence counsel at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. His argument has prevailed at the court, which has acquitted everyone accused of pre-planned 'conspiracy to genocide,' issuing convictions only for crimes committed after the assassination of Rwanda's Hutu president. (...) If Mr. Caplan truly wants to promote peace in Rwanda, rather than the myth that past violence was one-sided, he should support the rights of Ms. Ingabire and her lawyer."

Erlinder may indeed hold political opinions at the fringes of the debate, and many articles he has published may draw intense disagreement and criticism. However to see this man ignored by the president of the United States and consigned to unlawful imprisonment by the lowest elements of the Kagame sycophants because of his political views is a grave disappointment. Everyone is entitled to the right to defense and basic human rights, and this individual has not committed the acts he is accused of.

The increasingly authoritarian government of Paul Kagame is causing significant damage to its international reputation with this case, especially given the fact that now only more people will be interested in viewing all of the evidence compiled by Erlinder.

The people of Rwanda have had a difficult past, and now once again have a difficult present, but the way forward is not to shun the processes of international justice, but rather to work through them toward truth, reconciliation, and peace.


Follow Robert Amsterdam on Twitter: www.twitter.com/robertamsterdam

Monday, June 14, 2010

Rwanda: Detained Lawyer's Wife To Speak With U.N. Security Council Members

Masako Usui, the wife of the U.S. Professor and Attorney Peter Erlinder, is traveling to New York City this week on a mission to visit United Nations Security Council members.

Her husband, Peter Erlinder was arrested by Rwanda Police in Kigali on May 28, 2010. She plans to ask for their assistance in urging Rwanda to free Professor Erlinder and drop all charges.

Professor Erlinder is a law professor at William Mitchell College of Law, lead defense attorney for the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (I.C.T.R.), and President of the I.C.T.R. defense lawyers association. The I.C.T.R. which was set up by the United Nations Security Council in 1994 to prosecute war criminal for events that happened in 1994.

Erlinder faces charges of genocidal ideology and threatening Rwandan national security. These charges are directly related to the vigorous defense of his clients. He successfully proved to the I.C.T.R. that the genocide had not been planned or executed by the persons he represented, Aloys Ntabakuze.

According to the Rwanda prosecutor and court, the basis for the charges against him are that he: Publicly wrote, outside of Rwanda, in defense of his clients through articles, press releases and open letters to public officials calling for a deeper examination of the events that happened in 1994 and suggests that there could be a different narrative based on factual evidence; and, he filed wrongful death lawsuit against Paul Kagame in the Oklahoma Federal court under the Alien Tort Claims

Act on behalf of his client, Agathe Habyarimana, the widow of the former Rwandan president.

Erlinder continues to be held, now in Kigali Central Prison, after he received a judgment on Monday, June 7, 2010, denying him bail or any type of release.

The spokesman of “United Nations-backed tribunal for Rwanda," Roland Amoussouga, stated, in a New York Times June 13, article: “I.C.T.R. will not allow anyone to be prosecuted for the work that it has done for it.”

The same New York Times article also reported, “Despite assurances from Rwanda that Mr. Erlinder was not arrested for his work at the tribunal, officials at the tribunal say they also believe there is a connection. They have asked Rwanda for clarification and may bring the case in front of the United Nations Security Council."

Among many human rights and legal organizations that have called for Erlinder’s release, the American Bar Association points to the U.N. Basic Principals on the Role of Lawyers, which state that lawyers “shall not be identified with their clients or their client's causes as a result of discharging their functions” and that “governments shall ensure that lawyers are able to perform all of their functions without intimidation, hindrance, harassment or improper influence.” These principals also provided that “lawyers like other citizens are entitled to freedom of expression, belief, association and assembly.”

The International Criminal Defense Attorneys Association (ICDAA) denounced and condemned Peter Erlinder’s continued detention in the strongest possible terms and urged all concerned to demand his immediate release.

In a joint statement to the court and the UN security council, many defense lawyers have demanded Erlinder's immediate release: "We hereby resolve to postpone all activities, other than those which strictly conserve the interests of our mandates, until such time as the minimum conditions of the normal exercise of our missions have been restored by the removal of threats," the statement says.

This continued detention has prompted other defense lawyers at the ICTR to refuse to participate in proceedings. Five defense teams before the ICTR have filed motions saying it was too dangerous to represent an accused, ICTR responded by launching contempt proceedings against another American defense lawyer, Peter Robinson, when Robinson stated his intention to withdraw from the case due to Erlinder's detention.

Saturday, June 12, 2010

BUSH AND OTHER WAR CRIMINALS MEET IN RWANDA : THE GREAT “ RWANDA GENOCIDE”-- COVERUP

BUSH AND OTHER WAR CRIMINALS MEET IN RWANDA : THE GREAT “ RWANDA GENOCIDE”-- COVERUP



Prof. Peter Erlinder, ICTR Lead Defense Counsel

President ADAD, the ICTR Defense Lawyers Association ©

As George Bush begins his much bally-hooed African safari, he has already begun to heap praise on Rwandan President Kagame as a “model for Africa .” But, recently issued French and Spanish international “war-crimes” warrants and new evidence at the UN Rwanda Tribunal have exposed Kagame as the war-criminal who actually touched-off the 1994 “Rwanda Genocide” by assassinating the previous President and who is benefiting from a decades-long U.S.-sponsored “cover-up” of Pentagon complicity in massacres committed by Kagame’s regime, which even Britain’s Economist has called “the most repressive in Africa.” [1]



Multiple “War Crimes” AWarrants Issued for Rwanda ’s Leaders



Just last week, a Spanish Judge issued 40 international warrants for current and former members of Kagame’s government, including senior staff at Rwanda ’s Washington Embassy. The warrants charge Kagame’s clique with war-crimes and crimes against humanity, that may even fit the definition of “genocide.” But, these are not the only international arrest warrants issued for Rwanda’s current leaders.

French Judge Bruguiere (famous for indicting “the Jackal”) has also issued international warrants against nearly a dozen members of Kagame’s inner circle, too. Bruguiere also met with Kofi Annan in late 2006 to personally urge the U.N. Rwanda Tribunal to prosecute Kagame for the assassination of Juvenal Habyarimana, the war-crime that re-ignited the four-year Rwanda War and the massive civilian killings in the war’s final 90-days.

Could it be that no-one in the Bush Administration was aware of these pending charges against their Rwandan hosts….or is it that they just don’t care? In either case, the French and Spanish international arrest warrants have pierced the wall of U.S./UK/Rwandan propaganda about who bears responsible for the massive tragedy that unfolded in Rwanda …but the “official story” has actually been unraveling for some time (although largely un-reported in the U.S. media).



Chief UN Prosecutor del Ponte in 2003: “ Rwanda ’s Leaders Guilty of War Crimes”



In the summer of 2003, Chief Prosecutor for the United Nations International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda (ICTR), Carla del Ponte, publicly announced that she would soon begin prosecuting members of Kagame’s Government for the same kinds of crimes charged in the French and Spanish warrants. But, nearly 5 years later not one case has been filed against one member of Kagame’s government, nor against Kagame himself.


The del Ponte announced prosecutions did not go forward because she was replaced, within 90-days of her announcement, by Abubacar Jallow, a US/UK-approved Prosecutor who pledged not to prosecute on Kagame’s side….no matter what the del Ponte and the European judges’ findings! Prosecutor del Ponte’s long-time press-aide, Florence Hartmann, published a book in Paris in September 2007, that explains exactly how del Ponte was replaced.

Chief UN Prosecutor del Ponte was called to Washington just after her 2003 announcement and threatened with removal from office by Bush’ “war-crimes ambassador”, Pierre Prosper, because of the political quid pro quo between Washington and the Kagame regime that is spelled out in detail in the book. (Ironically, Prosper was a former ICTR prosecutor under del Ponte, and must have had access to the same information motivated her announcement) . When she refused to ignore her UN-mandate, to prosecute all crimes committed during the 1994 Rwanda War, she was sacked by the U.S. and U.K. [2]





ICTR Chief Investigator in 1997:

“ Rwanda ’s Kagame Assassinated Previous President”

But this is not the first time that crimes of Kagame have been “covered-up” at the ICTR. According to sworn affidavits placed in the ICTR record in early 2006, more than 10 years ago, ICTR Lead Investigative Prosecutor, well-respected Australian QC Michael Hourigan, recommended that Kagame, himself, be prosecuted for the assassination of Habyarimana. But, in 1997, then-Chief UN Prosecutor Louise Arbour of Canada ordered him to drop the Kagame investigation; to forget it ever happened; and, to burn his notes ! Hourigan resigned rather than comply and copies of his original notes are now part of the ICTR public record for all to see. [3]



The “ Rwanda Genocide” Cover-up on Clinton ’s Watch

The Hourigan affidavit makes clear that the “Rwanda Genocide”-- Cover-up has been going on for at least a decade…but the reasons for the cover-up did not become clear until late 2007, when a senior Clinton Administration diplomat, Brian Atwood, was confronted with UN documents describing a 1994 “cover-up” meeting with the Rwandan Foreign Minister in Kigali and the UN’s Kofi Annan. According to the UN documents, U.S.-sponsored human rights reports by investigator, Robert Gersony, had documented massive military-style executions of civilians by Kagame’s troops, during and after the final 90-days of the four-year Rwanda War. [4]



The former Rwandan Foreign Minister at the meeting, Jean Marie Ndagiyimana, testified at the ICTR that, rather than participate in the proposed “cover-up,” he resigned and went into exile where he remains today. His ICTR testimony confirmed that Clinton’s USAID Chief for Africa, Brian Atwood, and the chief of the UN Department of Peace Keeping Operations Kofi Annan, were both in his office in late October 1994 urging him to assist in the “cover-up” the war-crimes committed by Kagame’s forces. [5]



The “Inconvenient Truth” Behind the Cover-up :

Pentagon Complicity in the 1994 Rwanda War



The damning “Gersony Report” included first-hand evidence of tens of thousands of civilians being massacred by Kagame’s troops in eastern Rwanda, later confirmed by similar reports by Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. The U.N. Document (also in the ICTR record) says that Annan told the Foreign Minister that public knowledge of the Report would be “embarrassing to the UN” and the U.S. Former Clinton-diplomat, Brian Atwood, not only confirmed he was at the meeting, but explained that he had engaged Gersony, and that Gersony’s findings of war-crimes being committed by Kagame were “…an inconvenient truth” for both the United States and the UN.


According to Atwood, unknown to the State Department, “the Pentagon had been supporting Kagame since before the 1990 invasion, when he was the head of Military Intelligence for the Museveni government of Uganda.” The “Gersony Report” tied the Pentagon to the crimes of Kagame’s invading, Pentagon-trained and funded forces. More UN documents in the ICTR record reveal that the State Department was negotiating for a peaceful settlement of the war at the same time the Pentagon was supporting Kagame’s invasion. The Clinton Administration to enlisted Atwood and Kofi Annan in keeping evidence of Kagame’s crimes from ever seeing the light of day, to prevent Pentagon involvement in the “Rwandan Genocide” from ever coming to light. [6]


The existence of a separate Pentagon foreign policy on Rwanda also tallies with the ICTR testimony of former Ambassador Robert Flaten, who testified that he seriously doubted that Habyarimana’s supporters planned to kill civilians on a massive scale because the CIA and other intelligence agencies would have reported it when he was in Rwanda from 1990 to late 93. [7] He said that his requests for Pentagon-DIA spy satellite photographs showing the progress of the war in the countryside were turned down because of “clouds over Rwanda,” during his entire 3-plus years in Rwanda. [8] He also noted that support from Uganda for the 1990 Kagame invasion coincided with increased Ugandan military funding by the U.S./U.K. Flaten also testified that he personally warned Kagame that “he would be responsible for massacres like just happened in Burundi, if Kagame broke the cease-fire and re-started that war.

In short, the evidence that now is in the public record shows that during the 1994 Rwanda Genocide, the Pentagon could have stopped the carnage with a phone call….and the State Department apparently did not know enough about the Pentagon’s close ties to Kagame to ask them to do so, at least until USAID’s Atwood was informed of Pentagon reaction to the “Gersony Report,” in the summer of 1994.

Other de-classified State Department documents show that it was the invading Kagame forces that were the aggressors, and were blocking the State Departments efforts to implement the Arusha Accords, peace agreement. [9] The UN’s General Dallaire has testified that Kagame would not agree to a ceasefire to use troops to stop the massacres because “he was winning the war.” [10] And, now we know what Dallaire may not have known, until later…Kagame was winning with the Pentagon’s help.



The Great “Rwanda Genocide” Cover-up Continues under Bush

The “Rwanda Genocide” – Cover-up of Pentagon complicity in Kagame’s crimes is almost complete, as the U.S. cuts Rwanda Tribunal funding to shut it down by the end of 2008. Carla del Ponte’s replacement, Abubacar Jallow, will be conveniently unable to carry out the prosecutions that del Ponte urged in 2003, or those initiated by Judge Bruguiere in 2006, or Judge Ag____, just last week.

However, the international warrants are still in effect, the del Ponte book and Hourigan’s affidavit have begun to unravel the whole sordid manipulation… .but, unless the “Rwanda Genocide” Cover-up makes it onto Page One in Europe and North America, it may be too late for the ICTR detainees….who are being held responsible for the crimes of the Kagame regime, a bit like the UN holding the Japanese responsible for Hiroshima and the Germans for the fire-bombing of Dresden.

With U.S. and U.K. support, Kagame’s government is actively campaigning to have all ICTR matters transferred to Rwanda and has issued 40,000 warrants for Kagame’s Hutu and Tutsi opponents in the worldwide Rwandan diaspora. (A movement that includes such as figures Paul Rusesabagina, the real hero of the Hotel Rwanda ).


Correcting the Historical Record and Ending the Cover-up


But, I have to disclose my own bias because, under the laws of Rwanda , I too am a criminal “negationist” for writing this essay and President Kagame has personally denounced me as a “genocidaire” for my work as an ICTR defense lawyer. My former investigator is seeking asylum in Europe and the ICTR Prosecutor who replaced Carla del Ponte is now prosecuting defense investigator for asking too many questions in Rwanda, but denounced Judge Bruguiere’s request for the UN to prosecute Kagame and Spanish Judge Abreau, as well.



An ICTR defense lawyer, like me, has to hope that, despite all that is now known about the manipulations of the ICTR by the U.S. and U.K. for their own political purposes, the ICTR Judges will not be influenced by the sacking of del Ponte and that they will carefully evaluate the evidence in my client’s case….but it is hard to be too optimistic.


At least my conscience is clear, now that the Great “Rwanda Genocide”— Cover-up has been exposed. But, I wonder if the Judges, Prosecutors, other UN-ICTR officials (who now know about the manipulation of their best efforts) will be able to say the same, if they allow the ICTR “Rwanda Genocide”- Cover-up to continue?

During the week’s festivities in Rwanda, the Presidents Bush and Kagame are sure to find much in common, as would Tony Blair, who has recently signed-on as an “unpaid”-advisor to Kagame. All three stand accused of war crimes, and are mutually benefiting from the US/UK/Rwandan “cover-up” of their own complicity in the “Rwandan Genocide” tragedy….that should put all three in the dock at the UN-ICTR.



© Prof. Peter Erlinder, Wm. Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul , MN 55105 (651-290-6384) peter.erlinder@ wmitchell. edu . Past- President of the National Lawyers Guild and is Lead Defence Counsel for former Major Aloys Ntabakuze in the Military 1 Trial at the ICTR, the central case in the Tribunal. All of the documents and testimony referenced above are in the court record at the ICTR, except for the interview of Ambassador Brian Atwood, which occurred in December 2007 at his office at the University of Minnesota , Humphrey Institute.


[1]
The Economist , April, 2004

[2] Hartmann, Paix et chatiment: les guerres del la politique (2007 Flammarion, Paris)

[3] See Hourigan Affidavit and related documents in Miltary 1 record at the ICTR.

[4] See, UN documents in the Military 1 trial record at the ICTR.

[5] See ICTR Testimony of Ndagiyimana, November 2006, and related documents

[6] Interview with Dean Brian Atwood, Humphrey Institute, University of Minnesota , December 22, 2007.

[7] See Flaten ICTR testimony, July 2006.

[8] Interview with Robert Flaten in Arusha TZ, July 2006.

[9] See, April 1, 1994 Cable from U.S. Embassy in Kigali to Kampala Uganda in the ICTR Military 1 Trial Record.

[10] See ICTR Testimony of Gen. Romeo Dallaire and associated documents, January 2006.



Global Research Articles by Peter Erlinder

Kagame And A Tale Of Two Rwandas

Last week, former President Clinton published a glowing essay that held up post-genocide Rwanda as an example for America and the world.

www.theglobalist.com/StoryId.aspx?StoryId=8470"


Here is an early quote: "But none of us have to win at someone else’s expense. The best example of this on earth that I have encountered is in Rwanda, where I do a lot of work. They’re the most amazing people I ever saw."

Days earlier, I had written something quite different.

http://www.sfbayview.com/2010/a-critique-of-%E2%80%98rwanda-the-two-faces-of-paul-kagame%E2%80%99-by-jon-rosen/



Reacting to a tendentious essay by a Kigali-based American reporter, my annoyed rebuttal did upset many self-identified Rwandans.

http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/5629/rwanda-the-two-faces-of-paul-kagame


First, I argued that Rwanda’s post-genocide leadership is getting away with murder. Among other misdeeds, it was strangling democracy, especially free speech, the rule of law and free and fair elections.

This is a sample: "[R]ight now Kagame’s regime is shutting down newspapers, is kidnapping the homeless and is demonizing and pronouncing Ms. Ingabire guilty--before her sham trial even begins. And hours ago in Rwanda, Kagame arrested eminent American law professor, Peter Erlinder, who is defending Ms. Ingabire."

Additionally, I pointed out that Rwanda’s strongman is being coddled by three groups of American enablers—-by government policy makers; by business leaders and other influential individuals outside the administration; and worse of all, by American reporters acting like praise-singers.

This was my bottom line: "All this reeks because it continues a tradition of Western elites telling Africans to be happy living under dictatorships that those elites would not tolerate in their own countries for a single day."

My opinion of what should be done remains unchanged: True friends of Rwanda and Africa must tell the American people the truth--Washington is in bed with a repressive regime in Kigali. Once truth confronts falsehood, American politicians and bureaucrats will quickly put pressure on Rwanda’s leaders to change course.

Washington has more than sufficient leverage to do this because each year it sends millions of American tax dollars to Kigali.

The gushing conduits that flood Rwanda with American military and development aid include: the Africa Command, AFRICOM; Africa Contingency Training and Assistance, ACOTA; the Millennium Challenge Corporation, MCC; the Agency for International Development, USAID; the National Endowment for Democracy, NED; and the National Democratic Institute, NDI.

The State Department’s website states the truth succinctly, “Overall U.S. foreign assistance to Rwanda has increased four-fold over the past four years.” Specifically, the US has given Rwanda more than one billion dollars --$1,034,000,000 to be precise-- since 2000. And in the current fiscal year, President Obama proposes to give $240 million more.

Given the starkly different attitudes in our essays, some superficial readers have assumed that I must disagree vehemently with former President Bill Clinton. But I do not.

To the contrary, I agree 100% with Mr. Clinton. I am elated. Being an African immigrant long sick and tired of the media’s relentless negative stereotyping of Africa and Black people, I find it refreshing and wonderful that an American world leader of Mr. Clinton’s stature is holding up an African example for the world to emulate. It is about time.

Far from being unhappy, I gladly urge President Clinton to do more; to go further.

His essay praises a people, while mine lambastes a dictatorship. That is the simple explanation why my sharp criticism does not clash with Mr. Clinton’s praise.

The government I am unhappy with is President Paul Kagame’s. Its specific activities I condemn fall into three categories. There is its severe abuse of democratic principles and rights at home. I am terrified while Kigali has made commendable improvements, its iron-fisted rule is building an explosive time bomb--in a country whose leaders should know better because it has already been traumatized by a very recent genocide.

Next is Mr. Kagame’s invasions of the Congo and operation there of proxy militias. And then there is the plunder of the Congo’s resources, including conflict minerals.

President Kagame’s invasion, rent-seeking and plunder make him the leading figure among the many responsible for the Eastern Congo’s unspeakable catastrophe. We are talking about widespread, brutal rapes, mutilations, massive population displacement, and over 6 million deaths.

Lest we forget, these cross-border atrocities violate international law.

For us Africans, they are more--the singular, scary nightmare we have been desperately battling to prevent for over half a century since independence.

Reflect on why. With a few exceptions that prove the rule, every African country is a salad bowl of ethnicities, cultures, languages and other competing identities that are easily politicized and manipulated. Consequently friction and grievances abound. And our boundaries, carelessly drawn by rapacious, racist plunderers, are a mess. The only thing worse is violating or violently redrawing them.

Hence, Africans are very alarmed by Mr. Kagame’s invasions Congo and his manipulation of the Tutsi communities in both countries. His actions recall the late Siyaad Barre of Somalia, another US-backed dictator whose irredentist Ogaden wars bear much responsibility for today’s deadly situation in the Horn of Africa.

This is why even though Mr. Kagame may be loved and lionized in Washington, London and Paris, across Africa he worries us.

And it is why millions of Rwanda’s African sisters and brothers like me say: Yes, the Rwandan genocide did occur. It did kill over almost a million Africans—Rwandans to be precise. We share the pain and feel bottomless sympathy. However, that trauma can never justify violent predation that has already killed more than six million additional Africans—Congolese to be precise.

And Africans have a final question--for Mr. Kagame’s Western admirers and enablers: What do you say about his causal role in mass death and suffering in the Eastern Congo?

In contrast to my essay, Mr. Clinton’s focuses on regular people. It tells the amazing stories of four typical Rwandans, all but one of whom remain nameless in Mr. Clinton’s telling. Like Mr. Nelson Mandela, the two female and two male Rwandans are doing the impossible--forgiving, putting the nightmarish past behind them, and looking to and building the better future.

I too consider their example the best of Africa and want it lauded and copied. To repeat then: I completely agree with President Clinton’s praise of post-genocide Rwanda’s people. A people this forgiving, this resilient, this admirable deserve the very best governance—meaning democracy.

That is why President Clinton has a sacred obligation, in my opinion. He needs to use his incomparable influence to persuade Rwanda’s government to make big changes both domestically and externally. Domestically, Kigali must embark on real democracy, including adhering to universal standards in the rule of law, in free speech and in free and fair elections.

And Mr. Clinton must persuade Kigali to rein in its army and militias in the Congo, to end the plunder, to make amends, and to respect the full sovereignty of the Congo and other neighbors.

Admittedly, these are gigantic tasks and processes that will take years. But precisely because they are thousand-mile journeys, they must start immediately with a vital first step: American law professor and defense attorney Peter Erlinder must be freed.

So, over to you, Mr. President: Please repeat your uplifting North Korea rescue saga. Bring fellow attorney Peter Erlinder home from his Kigali dungeon.


Nii Akuetteh, former executive director of www.africaaction.org and adjunct professor at the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, is a member of the Scholars’ Council at www.transafricaforum.org and founder of the Democracy and Conflict Research Institute in Accra, Ghana, and the Open Society Initiative for West Africa www.osiwa.org


Please post your comments directly online or send them to milton@blackstarnews.com to avoid truncation


"Speaking Truth To Empower."

U.S. Criminal Defense Bar Challenges Rwandan Pres. Kagame to End his Campaign of Intimidation against Defense Lawyers.

U.S. Criminal Defense Bar Challenges Rwandan Pres. Kagame to End his Campaign of Intimidation against Defense Lawyers.

0diggsdigg
For more information:
Jack King
Director, Public Affairs
(202) 872-8600 x228
jack@nacdl.org
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Washington, DC (June 10, 2010) – The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) condemns the unrelenting intimidation of American criminal defense lawyers in Rwanda and reiterates its call for the prompt release of Prof. Peter Erlinder together with an immediate end to the Rwandan government’s interference with the criminal defense function. NACDL stands with the 30 defense lawyers practicing before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) who together, in a statement to the court and the UN Security Council, said they fear for their own safety and have demanded Peter Erlinder's immediate release.

Mr. Erlinder, a professor at William Mitchell College of Law in St. Paul, Minn., was arrested on May 28, 2010, on charges of “genocide ideology,” or genocide denial, for statements allegedly made before the ICTR and in the United States. He has been representing presidential candidate Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, an opposition candidate in upcoming elections who herself was recently arrested on the same charge and released. Prof. Erlinder was denied bail on June 7 and remains in police custody. In addition, it is now being reported that NACDL member Peter Robinson, a Santa Rosa, Calif., defense attorney working in the ICTR, is being threatened with charges of contempt. In light of the arrest and detention of Prof. Erlinder, Robinson, who represents Joseph Nzirorera, the former President of the Rwandan National Assembly, is seeking to withdraw from his defense before the ICTR. It is further reported that Kurt Kerns, a Wichita, Kan., defense attorney and NACDL member, was threatened with arrest for “unauthorized practice of law” after allegedly referring to the police who arrested Erlinder as “punks.”

Taken together, these events, and the ongoing, outrageous detention of Prof. Erlinder, suggest an effort by the current regime to repress political opposition leaders as the August elections in Rwanda approach.

“While the genocide in Rwanda was truly a tragedy from which Rwanda has yet to fully recover, this blatant intimidation of respected criminal defense attorneys undermines the very basis of the criminal justice system in that nation,” NACDL President Cynthia Hujar Orr said today. “As long as the Kagame regime continues to interfere with criminal defense lawyers representing the accused, justice will remain out of reach for Rwanda. NACDL challenges the Kagame government to live up to the democratic ideals espoused by the Rwandan constitution and the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights and to immediately cease this highly improper and self-destructive campaign of intimidation.”

NACDL also supports the resolution introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Betty McCollum on Tuesday (H.Res. 1426) urging the Rwandan government to release Prof. Erlinder and allow him to return to the United States, Orr said.

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL’s 10,000-plus direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling more than 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.

Friday, June 11, 2010

U.S. Criminal Defense Bar Challenges Rwandan Pres. Kagame: End the Campaign of Intimidation against Defense Lawyers

U.S. Criminal Defense Bar Challenges Rwandan Pres. Kagame:
End the Campaign of Intimidation against Defense Lawyers

U.S. Criminal Defense Bar Challenges Rwandan Pres. Kagame:
End the Campaign of Intimidation against Defense Lawyers


Washington, DC (June 10, 2010) – The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) condemns the unrelenting intimidation of American criminal defense lawyers in Rwanda and reiterates its call for the prompt release of Prof. Peter Erlinder together with an immediate end to the Rwandan government’s interference with the criminal defense function. NACDL stands with the 30 defense lawyers practicing before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) who together, in a statement to the court and the UN Security Council, said they fear for their own safety and have demanded Erlinder's immediate release.

Erlinder, a professor at William Mitchell College of Law in St. Paul, Minn., was arrested on May 28, 2010, on charges of “genocide ideology,” or genocide denial, for statements allegedly made before the ICTR and in the United States. He has been representing presidential candidate Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, an opposition candidate in upcoming elections who herself was recently arrested on the same charge and released. Prof. Erlinder was denied bail on June 7 and remains in police custody. In addition, it is now being reported that NACDL member Peter Robinson, a Santa Rosa, Calif., defense attorney working in the ICTR, is being threatened with charges of contempt. In light of the arrest and detention of Prof. Erlinder, Robinson, who represents Joseph Nzirorera, the former President of the Rwandan National Assembly, is seeking to withdraw from his defense before the ICTR. It is further reported that Kurt Kerns, a Wichita, Kan., defense attorney and NACDL member, was threatened with arrest for “unauthorized practice of law” after allegedly referring to the police who arrested Erlinder as “punks.”

Taken together, these events, and the ongoing, outrageous detention of Prof. Erlinder, suggest an effort by the current regime to repress political opposition leaders as the August elections in Rwanda approach.

“While the genocide in Rwanda was truly a tragedy from which Rwanda has yet to fully recover, this blatant intimidation of respected criminal defense attorneys undermines the very basis of the criminal justice system in that nation,” NACDL President Cynthia Hujar Orr said today. “As long as the Kagame regime continues to interfere with criminal defense lawyers representing the accused, justice will remain out of reach for Rwanda. NACDL challenges the Kagame government to live up to the democratic ideals espoused by the Rwandan constitution and the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights and to immediately cease this highly improper and self-destructive campaign of intimidation.”

NACDL also supports the resolution introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Betty McCollum on Tuesday (H.Res. 1426) urging the Rwandan government to release Prof. Erlinder and allow him to return to the United States, Orr said.

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL’s 10,000-plus direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling more than 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Arrest of Rwandan opposition leader lawyer a blow to ICTR, international lawyers warn

An umbrella body for international criminal lawyers has warned that the continued detention of an opposition leader’s lawyer in Rwanda could deal a major blow to the operations of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR).

Addressing a Press conference in Kampala at the ongoing International Criminal Court Review Conference, lawyers attached to the International Criminal Bar (ICB) condemned the continued detention of their American colleague, Prof Peter Erlinder, who is defending Ms Victoire Ingabire, an opposition leader and candidate for presidency in Rwanda.

Ms Ingabire, is the leader of the United Democratic Forces (UDF), a political party that has up to date been denied opportunity to be registered to participate in the presidential poll due this August.

Related Stories

* ICC, must determine crime of aggression, African states insist
* ICC lead petitioner held, released
* Arrest Mr. Bashir, ICC tells Uganda
* Uganda’s position on crime of aggression still guarded
* Ban Ki-Moon calls on states to support ICC
* States yet to agree on crime of aggression

She is under house arrest and her aide put in custody for over a month now.

“Arrest of Erlinder violates fundamental human rights and the allegations against him pertain to the work he is doing at the ICTR. This is an attack on the independence of counsel and lawyers are afraid for their own security,” said Ms Allison Turner, ICB council member, said in Munyonyo on Tuesday.

Ms Turner said that in another case before the ICTR, a defence lawyer told the court that under the circumstances where he was at risk, he could not in good conscience continue representing his client.”

A Kigali court on Monday ordered that Professor Erlinder be detained, without having been charged with any crime. Prof Erlinder has been in been in detention since May 28.

The incident has prompted other defence lawyers at the UN tribunal, which sits in Arusha, Tanzania, to refuse to participate in proceedings.

"We hereby resolve to postpone all activities, other than those which strictly conserve the interests of our mandates, until such time as the minimum conditions or the normal exercise of our missions has been restored by the removal of threats," the statement says. "[We are] aware of the dangers which immediately and directly threaten most of our number," the statement reads.

The treatment of defence lawyers has prompted widespread international condemnation, with the US government calling for Erlinder's release.

The case is also likely to place pressure on the UK authorities, including the Crown Prosecution Service, which has been providing assistance to Rwanda prosecutors to facilitate the extradition of genocide suspects currently residing in the UK.

The case also comes amid increasing concern about freedom of information in Rwanda, after two main opposition newspapers – Umuvugizi and Umuseso – were targeted with a number of libel and privacy cases, and prohibited from publishing until after the coming elections.

America walks diplomatic tightrope with pro-business, yet authoritarian Rwanda

Three Rwandan opposition parties have asked the United States to use its influence to help resolve social and political tension in the country before the presidential election in August.

Rights groups say the government and the ruling Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) have become increasingly intolerant of dissent and criticism in the run-up to the vote, which President Paul Kagame is widely expected to win.

In an open letter last week to the U.S. ambassador in Kigali, Stuart Symington, and seen by Reuters on Sunday, the three-party coalition said: "We strongly believe that your leverage as the ambassador of the United States of America in Rwanda can help diffuse tensions as the presidential elections loom and... (the) military crisis deepens."

...The coalition asked for U.S. assistance in opening up politics, changing anti-genocide legislation and guaranteeing the security forces remained outside politics, and sought a postponement of the ballot, due take place on Aug. 9, to allow more time to ensure it is transparent and free.

"Unless (development) efforts are underpinned by democracy, freedom and the rule of law, the achievements in that area will not be sustainable," the parties said.

US policy towards Rwanda since the genocide has always been a mixed bag.

On the one hand, diplomats are constrained by the fact that the Clinton Administration chose not to intervene in the genocide – and deliberately prevented others from doing so.

Add that guilt to the tension between the Rwandan government and the French and Belgians and in many ways it made strategic sense for the United States to support one of the few bastions of stability and economic growth in a volatile region.

On the other hand, American diplomats are not stupid.

By and large, they don't blindly support Kagame while ignoring his undemocratic tendencies.

Most Western diplomats in the region have tracked these issues for years, along with Kigali's role in fostering conflict in and stealing minerals from the DRC. But they tend to walk a fine line and are rarely vocal critics of the regime.

In the past couple of years, however, we've seen US administrations become increasingly willing to call Kagame out, albeit in mostly muted ways.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Johnnie Carson's recent testimony before Congress about the tightening of political space in Rwanda is the clearest statement to date that the U.S. is not willing to let Rwanda get away with repression.

Let's hope that the follow-through - including the delegation of US observers who are to monitor the August 9 presidential elections - is appropriately forceful and sends a clear message that Rwanda's people are best served by a free, open, and fair political system.
On a related note, Jason Stearns' recent post on Rwanda-DRC-Uganda relations is a must-read for anyone interested in the Great Lakes' regional political dynamics.

--- Laura Seay blogs at Texas in Africa.

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Friends and Supporters March for Peter Erlinder

Supporters March for Peter Erlinder

Updated: Tuesday, 08 Jun 2010, 9:23 PM CDT
Published : Tuesday, 08 Jun 2010, 9:23 PM CDT

SAINT PAUL, Minn. - Supporters of detained U.S. Attorney Peter Erlinder marched for him on Tuesday in hopes of freeing him from the Rwandan prison.

Erlinder, a human rights attorney has represented unpopular causes and clients, including one FOX 9 interviewed in March of 2009. 20 years ago, Elsie Mayard met Professor Erlinder. She says Erlinder was there when nobody else would help her.

"He mean the whole world to me because of how much he cared what happened to me because he protected my constitutional rights," said Mayard.

Appearing weak in court on Monday, a Rwandan judge denied bail for Erlinder who is charged with denying Rwanda’s 1994 genocide. Erlinder was in the country helping with the legal defense of an opposition leader, who wants to run for president.

Attorney Bruce Nestor of the National Lawyers Guild says Erlinder's prosecution threatens the ability of all attorneys to defend their clients.

"I’m afraid it looks like this is not something that's going to be over in the near term but is going to require our long term work and effort to bring peter back here to the twin cities," said Nestor.

In Minnesota, Senator Amy Klobuchar says they are working hard to bring him home.

"We have been pushing to have an expedited hearing so that he can at least be out on bail and at best be able to go home to his family. His wife and daughter and that's what we've been working on," said Klobuchar.

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

National Lawyers Gild PROTEST TO FREE PETER ERLINDER!

Date:
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Time:
12:00pm - 1:00pm
Location:
Rwanda Mission to the UN
Street:
124 East 39th Street
City/Town:
New York, NY

View Map
Description
PROTEST TO FREE PETER ERLINDER!

Sponsored by the National Lawyers Guild New York City Chapter

Contact nlgnyc@igc.org for more information or to endorse the call and protest.

The National Lawyers Guild New York City Chapter (NLG-NYC) demands the immediate release of former NLG president, Professor Peter Erlinder, whom Rwandan Police arrested on May 28, 2010 on charges of “genocide ideology.” He had traveled to Rwanda’s capital, Kigali, on May 23, to join the defense team of Rwandan presidential candidate Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza and the charges stem from the vigorous legal representation he is obligated to provide as a defense attorney. He pleaded not guilty to the charges on Friday, June 4 at a hearing in Kigali.

Erlinder has been interrogated at the Rwandan Police Force’s Kacyiru headquarters and has been hospitalized twice since his detention. The NLG-NYC is extremely concerned for the safety and well-being of Professor Erlinder. His family has still not had any direct contact with him since his arrest.

Erlinder traveled to Kigali after attending the Second International Criminal Defense Lawyers’ Conference in Brussels. Since his arrival in Kigali, the state-sponsored Rwandan media has been highly critical of Erlinder.

The Rwandan Parliament adopted the “Law Relating to the Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Ideology” (Genocide Ideology Law), on July 23, 2008. It defines genocide ideology broadly, requires no link to any genocidal act, and can be used to include a wide range of legitimate forms of expression, prohibiting speech protected by international conventions such as the Genocide Convention of 1948 and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966.

Professor Erlinder is a professor of law at the William Mitchell College of Law. He is a frequent litigator and consultant, often pro bono, in cases involving the death penalty, civil rights, claims of government and police misconduct, and criminal defense of political activists. He is also a frequent news commentator. Erlinder was president of the National Lawyers Guild from 1993-1997, and is a current board member of the NLG Foundation. He has been a defense attorney at the UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda since 2003.

The National Lawyers Guild, founded in 1937, is the oldest and largest public interest/human rights bar organization in the United States. Its headquarters are in New York and it has chapters in every state.

Rwanda genocide tribunal lawyers fear for their safety after colleague's arrest

Rwanda genocide tribunal lawyers fear for their safety after colleague's arrest
Denial of Peter Erlinder's bail prompts more than 30 defence lawyers to issue joint statement to UN court

Afua Hirsch, legal affairs correspondent

American lawyer Peter Erlinder was denied bail in Rwanda yesterday, two weeks after his arrest on charges of denying genocide. Photograph: AP/Marc Hofer

Lawyers defending suspects at the international criminal tribunal for Rwanda say they fear for their safety, after a high profile defence lawyer remained in police custody.

Peter Erlinder, a US lawyer leading the defence case of top genocide suspects, was denied bail today by the Rwanda authorities, two weeks after his arrest on charges of denying genocide.

The arrest has prompted other defence lawyers at the UN tribunal, which sits in Arusha, Tanzania, to refuse to participate in proceedings. In a joint statement to the court and the UN security council, seen by the Guardian, more than 30 defence lawyers have said they fear for their own safety and have demanded Erlinder's immediate release.

"We hereby resolve to postpone all activities, other than those which strictly conserve the interests of our mandates, until such time as the minimum conditions or the normal exercise of our missions have been restored by the removal of threats," the statement says. "[We are] aware of the dangers which immediately and directly threaten most of our number."

The Guardian has learned that the tribunal launched contempt proceedings against another American defence lawyer, Peter Robinson, after he stated his intention to withdraw from the case due to Erlinder's continued detention.

The treatment of defence lawyers has prompted widespread international condemnation, with the US government calling for Erlinder's release.

The case is also likely to place pressure on the UK authorities, including the Crown Prosecution Service, which has been providing assistance to Rwanda prosecutors to facilitate the extradition of genocide suspects currently residing in the UK.

Experts say the incident undermines negotiations surrounding the international criminal court, under way in Kampala. "How can international criminal courts operate effectively if defence lawyers are at risk of being arrested for what they say on behalf of their clients?" said Amanda Pinto QC, Bar Council representative at the International Criminal Bar. "This affects all defence lawyers at the ICTR, but the issues are potentially the same for defence counsel anywhere in the international forum."

The case also comes amid increasing concern about freedom of information in Rwanda, after two main opposition newspapers – Umuvugizi and Umuseso – were targeted with a number of libel and privacy cases, and prohibited from publishing until after the coming elections.

The Rwandan government has continued to defend its decision to detain Erlinder. "It is an act of justice," foreign affairs minister Louise Mushikiwabo said in a statement. "Flagrant and orchestrated breaches of our genocide ideology laws will be met with the full force of the law."

Do you want to know why Peter Erlinder is in jail?

Wanna know why Peter is detained ?Then you
better start with this document : http://www.grandslacs.net/doc/3588.pdfThe
truth about the rwandan genocide is a pandora's box . Many highly
regarded people are involved,in one way or another( especially the
clinton administration, the UN security council , the canadian sen......ator
Dallaire , the Tanzanian gvt , the Ugandan gvt , Ethiopia ..... ) I
am afraid , they are so many and so powerful that they may prefer waging
another war instead of letting truth come to light. They covered
not only the genocide , but also the assassination of 4 african heads
of states ( 2 in burundi: Merchiol Ndadaye and Cyprian Ntaryamira , 1
in rwanda : Juvenal Habyarimana (and his suit including the Army
chief of staff) and 1 in DRC: Laurent Desire Kabila ) . On the
top of the genocide (which they encouraged by "blocking any kind of
intervention from the international community", or sending their troops
in Rwanda to help the RPF conquer the total power) , they also have
responsibility on death of millions of Rwandans (Hutu and Tutsi ,
opposed to Kagame & RPF's regime , as well as the death of unknown
number of entire Hutu and Tutsi families and simple citizens who dies
just because they were born Hutu) and are still dying up to this very
hour ! Their number is unknown (it is in millions , though ! 2 or 3
million, I guess), but it will be known one day ! That is what
statistics are for, isn't it ?The same group of people covered a
MISERABLE DEATH OF CONGOLESE PEOPLE. I don't even where and how I can
start to explain this. Have you ever heard of a people being
killed/raped/humiliated in eve just beacuse they are "warm-hearted,
welcoming and willing to help refugees with compassion and sympathy " ??
. Well , I know such a people : the Congolese people . Now more than
10% of them are dead of bullets, bombs , rapes , deseases, hunger and
IDP conditions .... their country is in total ruin and pillaged ,
their women and daughters raped by thousands (the number were 40,000 of
raped women in 2004 , imagine what is by now. Recently , I have come
to know that even men are being raped too ) then their private parts
mutilated ! This once welcoming and compassionate people is now overly
exhausted . Some of them who are courageous have taken arms , and some
even turned into beast by what they have lived ! I really can't blame
them . We , Rwandan who exported our hatred in their country are to
be blamed for what is happening in DRC now. With the Prof.
Erlinder's scenario , it looks like this whole thing is going worldwide
: it is the turn of US citizen to be silenced (as far as i know the
French do not speak of this anymore. The big brother/US-UK has ordered
to them shut up... now they are knelt before Kagame confessing their
capital sin titled "Operation Turquoise" ,begging for a small part of
the Congolese plunder ) ! Do you really think Prof. Erlinder
did anything wrong or unlawful in any way ?? I tend to believe his only
sin is discovering the truth( please refer to "http://www.rwandadocumentsproject.net/gsdl/cgi-bin/library"). They will
try everything to silence him , I am afraid . he may be american ,
rwandan ,Chinese or palestinian ... it does not matter to them . They
know nothing other than power and their political and financial
interests. Please , keep the pressure as high as possible !

US Deans of Law sent a letter to US Dep of States to ask for the release of Prof Erlinder

June 7, 2010
Honorable Hillary Clinton
Secretary of State
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20520
Dear Secretary Clinton:
We are deans of American law schools. As legal educators, we believe we have an obligation to nurture in our students the core values of the legal profession. These core values are threatened by the arrest in Rwanda of William Mitchell College of Law Professor Peter Erlinder. We are writing to respectfully request your assistance in ensuring his safety and release.
Prof. Erlinder was in Kigali to pursue a legal defense for Madame Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, an opposition candidate for President of Rwanda. Previously, Prof. Erlinder represented Rwandans accused of conspiracy and genocide before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Clearly, this work has not endeared him to the regime in Rwanda, which has arrested, interrogated, and imprisoned him for simply doing the work of the lawyer: advocating on behalf of his client.
The U.N. Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers state that lawyers “shall not be identified with their clients or their clients’ causes as a result of discharging their functions” and that “governments shall ensure that lawyers are able to perform all of their professional functions without intimidation, hindrance, harassment or improper interference.” These principles also provide that “lawyers like other citizens are entitled to freedom of expression, belief, association and assembly.”
Secretary Clinton, we respectfully ask that you urge the government of Rwanda to abide by these principles, to refrain from harassment of lawyers practicing law consistent with their professional obligations, and to release Prof. Erlinder forthwith.
Very truly yours,
(Affiliations are listed for identification only and do not represent institutional endorsement.)
R. Alexander Acosta, Florida International University
William E. Adams, Jr., Western State University College of Law
John B. Attanasio, Dedman School of Law Southern Methodist University
Martin H. Belsky, University of Akron School of Law
Paul Schiff Berman, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, Arizona State University.
Douglas Blaze, University of Tennessee College of Law
Jeff Brand, University of San Francisco School of Law
David A. Brennen, University of Kentucky College of Law
Shelley Broderick, University of the District of Columbia David A. Clarke School of Law
Doris DelTosto Brogan, Villanova University School of Law
Penelope Bryan, Whittier Law School
Judge John L. Carroll, Cumberland School of Law, Samford University William Mitchell College of Law
875 Summit Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55105

Monday, June 7, 2010

American Lawyer Denied Bail in Rwanda

American Lawyer Denied Bail in Rwanda
By JOSH KRON

Published: June 7, 2010


KAMPALA, Uganda — Peter Erlinder, the American lawyer charged in Rwanda for denying the country’s genocide and threatening its security through his writings, was refused bail Monday, despite health concerns and pressure from the American government.

In a bail hearing in Rwanda’s capital, Kigali, Mr. Erlinder’s request to return to the United States to seek treatment for a heart condition was turned down, and he will spend the next 30 days in jail until his trial begins. While the defense will have five days to appeal, the court decision seems to be frightening other lawyers working for the United Nations on Rwanda.

Mr. Erlinder, 62, is a lawyer at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in Arusha, Tanzania, and in the past he has advocated in defense of Native American tribes in Minnesota and a Canadian terrorism suspect. He came to Rwanda last month to represent Victoire Ingabire, a presidential candidate also accused of genocide denial and working with a rebel group.

Former ambassadors and some of Rwanda’s opposition parties have condemned the arrest of Mr. Erlinder, calling it the latest sign of increased government repression ahead of elections this August.

The United States, one of Rwanda’s closest military allies and largest financial donors, at first hesitated to comment openly. But after Mr. Erlinder was hospitalized and Rwanda authorities claimed he had “faked” a suicide attempt, the American government publicly called for his “immediate release.”

Mr. Erlinder was charged last week with denying the country’s genocide and threatening national security, after alleging in documents and at the tribunal that members of Rwanda’s current government shot down a presidential plane in 1994, setting off the genocide.

President Paul Kagame claims that the plane was shot down by extremists in the former Hutu government who committed the genocide, a cornerstone of the governing party’s narrative and political legitimacy. Under Rwanda’s anti-genocide laws, claiming otherwise can lead to decades in prison.

The arrest has strained already icy relations between Rwanda and the United Nations’ special courts.

“The Rwandan Government takes no pleasure from Mr. Erlinder’s plight," Louise Mushikiwabo, a government spokeswoman, said in a statement after the hearing. "But this needs to be understood: Flagrant and orchestrated breaches of our genocide ideology laws will be met with the full force of the law.”

Lawyers at the tribunal in Arusha following the case say the hearings in Kigali have already had a chilling effect, and they are threatening to leave the courts.

“I have moved to withdraw,” said Peter Robinson, a lawyer from California who defends a genocide suspect at the tribunal. “I cannot defend my client under these conditions.”

Mr. Robinson said in a telephone interview that he now feared being arrested himself and that Rwanda’s refusal to grant Mr. Erlinder bail could affect the work of up to 25 lawyers at the tribunal.

“As long as defense lawyers are subject to prosecution, we can’t continue to participate in cases here.”

RWANDA:Latest Updates on Peter Erlinder

Latest Updates on Peter Erlinder
Contact:
Paige Cram,
Communications Coordinator,
212-679-5100, ext. 15
Monday, June 7

11:30 am

Peter was denied bail by the Rwandan judge this morning. He will remain in custody while the prosecution’s investigation continues until at least the end of this week.

http://www.startribune.com/politics/95778454.html

10:30 am

The NYC chapter is planning a protest for Peter outside the Rwandan consulate in NY tomorrow afternoon. Here are the details:

Tuesday, June 8, 12pm-1pm
124 East 39th Street, New York, NY

Please email Garrett Wright if you have any questions.

A demonstration is also planned in Minneapolis:
Tuesday, June 8, 5:00 p.m.
Federal Building
300 S 4th Street
Minneapolis, MN
Saturday, June 5

Peter was formally charged in Rwandan court and pleaded not guilty during a 5-hour hearing. We are awaiting the judge’s decision about whether Peter will be released on bail. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hVaq2CWv9pQElQWc58fi0FGjbSEgD9G528M86
Friday, June 4

9:00 am Scott Erlinder and David Gespass appeared this morning on Democracy Now! Watch the video: http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/4/family_members_fear_for_life_of
Thursday, June 3

9:00 pm President David Gespass and Scott Erlinder will appear on Democracy Now at 8:30 am EST on Friday, June 4. 3:00 pm The U.S. State Department is officially calling for Peter’s release: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gb8QoXA0ctT2XrirtdM8Tiu8ed4gD9G3UQ900 10:30 am At a press conference at the National Press Club, Peter’s family disclosed information about the alleged suicide attempt. According to the consular officials who met with Peter in the hospital, he took extra prescription pills in order to get out of a jail cell. Gena Berglund said in the press conference that taking the pills was a “strategy’ for Peter to escape the poor conditions in the cell where he is being held with seven or eight other inmates and handcuffed each time he is taken out of the cell. The family has still had no direct contact with Peter but is still hoping to meet with State Department officials this week. Wednesday, June 2
3:15

A Reuters article is reporting that Peter has retracted all statements that might have violated Rwandan law. However, the article relies on comments from the chief prosecutor in Rwanda and confirmation from an unnamed source. We have not received any information of this kind from anyone in close contact with Peter. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6515H320100602?feedType=RSS&feedName=worldNews
2:45 pm

The State Dept confirmed in its daily briefing today that Peter is back in the hospital and that both embassy officials and his lawyers have access to him. He will remain in the hospital overnight. The state department said it is not otherwise in a position to comment on the particulars of the situation, or on the specifics of his medical situation, citing patient confidentiality. The video and transcript of the briefing should be available after 4 pm at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/index.htm

.
1:30 pm

A troubling article also in several papers indicating that the Rwandan government has issued statements accusing Peter of attempted suicide by swallowing pills in his cell. Initial reports from Peter’s colleagues and lawyers in Rwanda assure us that this is false, government propaganda. However, Sarah Erlinder confirms that Peter is back in the hospital. The circumstances that brought him there are still unclear, but she said his lawyers and a representative from the U.S. Embassy have been able to visit him and report that he’s stable. We are concerned that this latest suicide report may indicate that Rwandan authorities might harm him. “I think that it means that his situation has gotten absolutely dire. I think that they have to either consider it an attempt on his life or laying the groundwork to kill him and claim that it was suicide,” Sarah Erlinder said in an interview from D.C.
11:30 am

Peter’s family and NLG representatives are in Washington, D.C. attempting to meet with the State Department and the UN. A press conference is scheduled for Thursday, June 3 at 9:30 am in the West Room of the National Press Club, 529 14th St, NW, Washington, D.C. Articles about Peter have appeared in the Associated Press, the Minneapolis Star Tribune and several other publications. Here is a sample of a few well-written profiles. http://www.startribune.com/local/95336614.html?page=1&c=y http://www.pressherald.com/news/ap?articleID=4660002 Monday, May 31 Report came in that Peter was brought to the hospital following interrogation. After tests were run, it was determined that high blood pressure was the problem and Peter was returned to the jail. This article from Minnesota Public Radio gives an update on his condition. Phone numbers of important officials to call on behalf of Peter: Call the White House: 202-456-1111 Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Secy of State Hillary Clinton: (202) 647-9572 Bureau of African affairs: (202) 647-4440 Johnnie Carson, Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs: (202) 647-2530 Rwanda embassy (NY): (212) 679-9010 or (212) 679-9023 Stephen J. Rapp war crimes ambassador: (202) 647-6051 Susan Rice, US AMB to the UN Accredited Journalists: (212) 415-4050 Rwanda Mission to the UN in USA: (212) 679-9010 or (212) 679-9023 Rwandan Amb. James Kimonyo: (202) 232-2882 Sample Call Script My name is ____________, I am calling/writing about the arrest of Prof. Peter Erlinder in Rwanda last Friday morning. He was in Rwanda acting as an attorney, representing his client, opposition presidential candidate Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza. I am asking to ask you to demand his immediate release from Rwandan jail. His detention violates his human rights, he is in danger and as an U.S. citizen deserves the highest level of advocacy and protection from the U.S. government. Saturday, May 29 Facebook group “Free Prof. Peter Erlinder Now” launches. Friday, May 28
3:00pm

First conference call to discuss options and ways to help. Peter’s family and the NLG asking people to call the following people to demand Peter’s release. Call and demand the immediate release of Professor Peter Erlinder: Senator Al Franken (202) 224-5641 Or send an email at http://franken.senate.gov/contact/ Senator Amy Klobuchar 202-224-3244 Fax: 202-228-2186 Or send an email at http://klobuchar.senate.gov/emailamy.cfm?contactForm=emailamy&submit=Go Representative Keith Ellison 202-225-4755 Or send an email at http://forms.house.gov/ellison/webforms/issue_subscribe.htm Representative Betty McCullom (202) 225-6631 Fax: (202) 225-1968 Or send an email at http://forms.house.gov/mccollum/webforms/issue_subscribe.htm
2:oo pm

NLG issues press release, and piece by Executive Director Heidi Boghosian appears in the Huffington Post

.
8:30 am

Peter Erlinder, professor at William Mitchell of Law, past NLG president and defense attorney for Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, was arrested by the Rwandan government on charges of “genocide ideology.”

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Green Party Condemns Rwanda's Arrest of Minnesota Attorney Peter Erlinder

Green Party Condemns Rwanda's Arrest of Minnesota Attorney Peter Erlinder

Distributed by the Green Party of the United States (http://www.gp.org).
See also a statement issued by the Democratic Green Party of Rwanda on the arrests (http://rwandagreendemocrats.org/spip.php?article65).

Green Party of Minnesota
http://www.mngreens.org

For immediate release
Friday, June 4, 2010

Contacts:
Dave Bicking, Spokesperson, 612-276-1213
Rhoda Gilman, Spokesperson, 651-224-6383


The Green Party of Minnesota joins human rights advocates and people of good will across the world to call on the U.S. government, the United Nations, and non-governmental organizations to prevail upon Rwanda to release Peter Erlinder immediately. We applaud his defense of the human and civil rights of Rwanda presidential candidate Victoire Ingabire, who was charged in April, 2010, with the same crime of which Erlinder is accused -- genocide denial.

Ingabire's party, the United Democratic Front (FDU), works closely with the Democratic Green Party of Rwanda, within the Consultative Council of Opposition Parties. Both parties have suffered governmental persecution and severe limitations on their ability to organize.

Rwandan president Paul Kagame seeks to silence Erlinder's efforts to expose the facts surrounding the 1994 Rwandan genocide (http://www.rwandadocumentsproject.net). His arrest was politically motivated and effectively punishes him for fulfilling his responsibilities as a vigorous and conscientious legal advocate for his client. "For decades Professor Erlinder has sought justice for his clients in the face of political repression," says Gena Berglund, Associate Director, International Humanitarian Law Institute of Minnesota and a member of the Green Party. "I am very skeptical of a government that locks up lawyers for speech crimes."

Peter Erlinder is a professor of law at William Mitchell College in St. Paul. In addition to his position as executive director of the Humanitarian Law Institute of Minnesota, he is Lead Counsel for the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) Defense Lawyers Association, past president of the National Lawyers Guild, and a practicing attorney. In an email sent to Berglund shortly before his arrest he wrote: "Victoire Ingabire, Rwandan Presidential Candidate, is like Mandela and I am very honored to be defending her."

"Rwanda remains one of the largest recipients of U.S. foreign assistance in Africa," says Berglund. "Given the U.S. government's expressed commitment to democracy and the rule of law, it is critical that the Obama Administration and the U.S. Congress uphold these values in Rwanda and demand the immediate release of Peter Erlinder.