Over a year after its completion, the UN mapping report has finally been leaked to the press. The report was mandated by the UN to investigate war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Congo between 1993 and 2003 in the hope that there could be accountability for the violence. To date, almost nothing has been done to bring those responsible to justice.
The report is huge, spanning 545 pages, and deals with war crimes committed by the security forces of Angola, Mobutu's Zaire, Uganda, Chad, Laurent
Kabila's government, Joseph
Kabila's government, Zimbabwe, the ex-FAR and
Interahamwe (and later the
FDLR), the Mai-Mai and the many other rebel groups. I will speak at length about the massacres carried out by these forces in later postings. Here, I will speak about the most controversial claim: the massacres carried out by the Rwandan army (
RPA) together with the
AFDL rebellion (led by Laurent
Kabila) against the Hutu refugees in 1996-1997.
The striking conclusion is that the crimes committed by the
RPA/
AFDL against Hutu refugees and Congolese Hutu could constitute a crime of genocide. This will be a bombshell for Paul
Kagame's government, which prides itself for having brought an end to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda and has built its reputation and its appeal to donors on its promotion of post-genocide reconciliation. This report will rock the
internet for months and years to come. Its political
importance is hard to overstate.
A few words of caution. The report was not based on the standards of a judicial investigation; it was intended to provide a broad mapping of the most serious human rights abuses between 1993 and 2003. Indeed, the report says that an international court will have to be the final arbiter of whether the
RPA/
AFDL did actually commit acts of genocide. Verbatim: "The systematic and widespread attacks described in this report, which targeted very large numbers of Rwandan Hutu refugees and members of the Hutu civilian population, resulting in their death, reveal a number of damning elements that,
if they were proven before a competent court, could be classified as crimes of genocide."
Nonetheless, the mapping team's mandate was to documents crimes of genocide, and it was rigorous: In total, the team gathered evidence on 600 incidents of violence between 1993 and 2003. Their standard was two independent sources for each incident. They interviewed 1,280 witnesses and gathered 1,500 documents. Many of the reports of killings of Congolese and Rwandan Hutu civilians were corroborated by eyewitnesses. While we always knew that there had been large massacres of Hutu refugees in the Congo, this is the first rigorous investigation, and the first time an international body has thrown its weight behind charges of genocide.
Another word of caution: This is the preliminary draft. The report is due to be released on Monday, but it has been leaked, I gather because Secretary General Ban Ki Moon - or othr UN officials - has pressed for the charges of "acts of genocide by the
RPA/
AFDL" to be removed. The Rwandan government has reportedly threatened to withdraw its troops from the AU mission in
Darfur and the UN mission in Haiti. I imagine that it is to prevent such editing that the report was finally leaked.
On to the conclusion of the report:
"Paragraph 512. The systematic attacks [...] resulted in a very large number of victims, probably tens of thousands of members of the Hutu ethnic group, all nationalities combined. In the vast majority of cases reported, it was not a question of people killed unintentionally in the course of combat, but people targeted primarily by
AFDL/APR/FAB [Burundian army] forces and executed in their hundreds, often with edged weapons. The majority of the victims were children, women, elderly people and the sick, who posed no threat to the attacking forces. Numerous serious attacks on the physical or
pyschological integrity of members of the group were also committed, with a very high number of
Hutus shot, raped, burnt or beaten. Very large numbers of victims were forced to flee and travel long distances to escape their pursuers, who were trying to kill them. The hunt lasted for months, resulting in the deaths of an unknown number of people subjected to cruel, inhuman and degrading living conditions, without access to food or medication. On several occasions, the humanitarian aid intended for them was deliberately blocked, in particular in
Orientale Province, depriving them of assistance essential to their survival
"Paragraph 513. At the time of the incidents covered by this report, the Hutu population in Zaire, including refugees from Rwanda, constituted an ethnic group as defined in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Moreover, as shown previously, the intention to destroy a group in part is sufficient to be classified as a crime of genocide. Finally, the courts have also confirmed that the destruction of a group can be limited to a particular geographical area. It is therefore possible to assert that, even if only a part of the Hutu population in Zaire was targeted and destroyed, it could nonetheless constitute a crime of genocide, if this was the intention of the perpetrators. Finally, several incidents listed also seem to confirm that the numerous attacks were targeted at members of the Hutu ethnic group as such. Although, at certain times, the aggressors said they were looking for the criminals responsible for the genocide committed against the
Tutsis in Rwanda in 1994, the majority of the incidents reported indicate that the
Hutus were targeted as such, with no discrimination between them. The numerous attacks against the
Hutus in Zaire, who were not part of the refugees, seem to confirm that it was all
Hutus, as such, who were targeted. The crimes committed in particular in
Rutshuru (30 October 1996) and
Mugogo (18 November 1996), in North
Kivu, highlight the specific targeting of the
Hutus, since people who were able to persuade the aggressors that they belonged to another ethnic group were released just before the massacres. The systematic use of barriers by the
AFDL/APR/FAB, particularly in South
Kivu, enabled them to identify people of Hutu origin by their name or village of origin and thus to eliminate them. Hundreds of people of Hutu origin are thus thought to have been arrested at a barrier erected in November 1996 in
Ngwenda, in the
Rutshuru territory, and subsequently executed by being beaten with sticks in a place called
Kabaraza. In South
Kivu,
AFDL/APR/FAB soldiers erected numerous barriers on the
Ruzizi plain to stop Rwandan and Burundian refugees who had been dispersed after their camps had been dismantled.
"514. Several incidents listed in this report point to circumstances and facts from which a court could infer the intention to destroy the Hutu ethnic group in the
DRC in part, if these were established beyond all reasonable doubt. Firstly, the scale of the crimes and the large number of victims are illustrated by the numerous incidents described above. The extensive use of edged weapons (primarily hammers) and the systematic massacre of survivors, including women and children, after the camps had been taken show that the numerous deaths cannot be attributed to the hazards of war or seen as equating to collateral damage. The systematic nature of the attacks listed against the
Hutus also emerges: these attacks took place in each location where refugees had been identified by the
AFDL/APR, over a vast area of the country. Particularly in North
Kivu and South
Kivu but also in other provinces, the massacres often began with a trick by elements of the
AFDL/APR, who summoned the victims to meetings on the pretext either of discussing their repatriation to Rwanda in the case of the refugees, or of introducing them to the new authorities in the case of
Hutus settled in the region, or of distributing food. Afterwards, those present were systematically killed. Cases of this kind were confirmed in the province of North
Kivu in
Musekera,
Rutshuru and
Kiringa (October 1996),
Mugogo and
Kabaraza (November 1996),
Hombo,
Katoyi,
Kausa,
Kifuruka,
Kinigi,
Musenge,
Mutiko and
Nyakariba (December 1996),
Kibumba and
Kabizo (April 1997) and
Mushangwe (around August 1997); in the province of South
Kivu in
Rushima and
Luberizi (October 1996),
Cotonco and
Chimanga (November 1996) and
Mpwe (February 1997) and on the
Shabunda-
Kigulube road (February-April 1997); in
Orientale Province in Kisangani and
Bengamisa (May and June 1997); in
Maniema in
Kalima (March 1997) and in
Équateur in
Boende (April 1997). Such acts certainly suggest premeditation and a precise methodology. In the region south of the town of
Walikale, in North
Kivu (January 1997), Rwandan
Hutus were subjected to daily killings in areas already under the control of the
AFDL/APR as part of a campaign that seemed to target any
Hutus living in the area in question.
"515. Several of the massacres listed were committed regardless of the age or gender of the victims. This is particularly true of the crimes committed in
Kibumba (October 1996),
Mugunga and
Osso (November 1996),
Hombo and
Biriko (December 1996) in the province of North
Kivu,
Kashusha and
Shanje (November 1996) in the province of South
Kivu,
Tingi-
Tingi and
Lubutu (March 1997) in
Maniema Province, and
Boende (April 1997) in
Équateur Province, where the vast majority of victims were women and children. Furthermore, no effort was made to make a distinction between
Hutus who were members of the ex-FAR/
Interahamwe and Hutu civilians, whether or not they were refugees. This tendency to put all
Hutus together and “tar them with the same brush” is also illustrated by the declarations made during the “awareness-raising speeches” made by the
AFDL/APR in certain places, according to which any Hutu still present in Zaire must necessarily be a perpetrator of genocide, since the “real” refugees had already returned to Rwanda. These “awareness-raising speeches” made in North
Kivu also incited the population to look for, kill or help to kill Rwandan Hutu refugees, whom they called “pigs”. This type of language would have been in widespread use during the operations in this region.
"516. The massacres in
Mbandaka and
Wendji, committed on 13 May 1997 in
Équateur Province, over 2,000 kilometres west of Rwanda, were the final stage in the hunt for Hutu refugees that had begun in eastern Zaire, in North and South
Kivu, in October 1996. Among the refugees were elements of the ex-FAR/
Interahamwe, who were disarmed by the local police force as soon as they arrived. In spite of everything, the
AFDL/APR opened fire on hundreds of defenceless Hutu refugees, resulting in large numbers of victims.
"517. The systematic and widespread attacks described in this report, which targeted very large numbers of Rwandan Hutu refugees and members of the Hutu civilian population, resulting in their death, reveal a number of damning elements that, if they were proven before a competent court, could be classified as crimes of genocide. The behaviour of certain elements of the
AFDL/APR in respect of the Hutu refugees and Hutu populations settled in Zaire at this time seems to equate to “a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group”, from which a court could even deduce the existence of a genocidal plan. “Whilst the existence of such a plan may contribute to
establishing the required genocidal intention, it is nonetheless only an element of proof used to deduce such an intention and not a legal element of genocide.” It should be noted that certain elements could cause a court to hesitate to decide on the existence of a genocidal plan, such as the fact that as of 15 November 1996, several tens of thousands of Rwandan Hutu refugees, many of whom had survived previous attacks, were repatriated to Rwanda with the help of the
AFDL/APR authorities and that hundreds of thousands of Rwandan Hutu refugees were able to return to Rwanda with the consent of the Rwandan authorities prior to the start of the first war. Whilst, in general, the killings did not spare women and children, it should be noted that in some places, at the beginning of the first war, Hutu women and children were in fact separated from the men, and only the men were
subsequently killed.
"518. Nonetheless, neither the fact that only men were targeted during the massacres, nor the fact that part of the group were allowed to leave the country or that there movement was facilitated for various reasons, are sufficient in themselves to entirely remove the intention of certain people to partially destroy an ethnic group as such. In this respect it seems possible to infer a specific intention on the part of certain
AFDL/APR commanders to partially destroy the
Hutus in the
DRC, and therefore to commit a crime of genocide, based on their conduct, words and the damning
circumstances of the acts of violence committed by the men under their command. It will be for a court with proper
jurisdiction to rule on this question."
