Africa Great Lakes Democracy Watch



Welcome to
Africa Great Lakes Democracy Watch Blog. Our objective is to promote the institutions of democracy,social justice,Human Rights,Peace, Freedom of Expression, and Respect to humanity in Rwanda,Uganda,DR Congo, Burundi,Sudan, Tanzania, Kenya,Ethiopia, and Somalia. We strongly believe that Africa will develop if only our presidents stop being rulers of men and become leaders of citizens. We support Breaking the Silence Campaign for DR Congo since we believe the democracy in Rwanda means peace in DRC. Follow this link to learn more about the origin of the war in both Rwanda and DR Congo:http://www.rwandadocumentsproject.net/gsdl/cgi-bin/library


Saturday, February 12, 2011

Human Rights Watch Report: Is Diplomacy a Fig Leaf for Inaction?

President Barack Obama and President Hu Jintao of China on the South Lawn of the White House, Jan. 19, 2011. (Photo: Pete Souza / whitehouse.gov)


Human Rights Watch Report: Is Diplomacy a Fig Leaf for Inaction?by: William Fisher, t r u t h o u t | News Analysis
During his presidential campaign, then-senator Barack Obama emphasized negotiations rather than military action. The Republicans ridiculed his focus on diplomacy as naive. "Strong countries and strong presidents meet and talk with our adversaries," Obama said during an August 19 debate. "We shouldn't be afraid to do so. We've tried the other way. It didn't work."
Candidate Obama argued that the United States had to put diplomacy at the forefront of American foreign policy. But today, a leading civil rights organization is charging that one aspect of diplomacy - the language of "dialogue" and "cooperation" - is little-understood, rarely reported on and is being used by governments throughout the world as a fig leaf to conceal their tacit acceptance of egregious human rights abuses.
"The ritualistic support of 'dialogue' and 'cooperation' with repressive governments is too often an excuse for doing nothing about human rights," says Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch (HRW).
His remarks come as the organization released its "World Report 2011," a 649-page summary of human rights issues and practices in more than 90 countries and territories worldwide.
"Too many governments are accepting the rationalizations and subterfuges of repressive governments, replacing pressure to respect human rights with softer approaches such as private 'dialogue' and cooperation.' ... Instead of standing up firmly against abusive leaders," many governments "adopt policies that do not generate pressure for change."
The report was particularly critical of the United Nations (UN), the European Union (EU) and the United States of America.
The famed eloquence of US President Barack Obama "has sometimes eluded him when it comes to defending human rights," the report says. It cites as examples bilateral contexts with China, India and Indonesia.
Criticism in the report is not limited to foreign policy. For example, it says that the United States "sets a dubious world record with 2,574 minors serving life sentences at the time the report was written."
It says Obama has failed to insist that the various agencies of the US government, such as the Defense Department and various embassies, convey strong human rights messages consistently - a problem, for example, in Egypt, Indonesia and Bahrain.
The report notes that Obama "increased his focus on human rights in his second year in office, but his eloquent statements have not always been followed by concrete actions. Nor has he insisted that the various US government agencies convey strong human rights messages consistently, with the result that the Defense Department and various US embassies - in Egypt, Indonesia, and Bahrain, for example - often deliver divergent messages."
The report charges that the Obama administration, in its first year, "simply ignored the human rights conditions on the transfer of military aid to Mexico, under the Merida Initiative, even though Mexico had done nothing as required toward prosecuting abusive military officials in civilian courts."
In its second year, the report says, although the administration "did withhold a small fraction of funding, it once again certified - despite clear evidence to the contrary - that Mexico was meeting Merida's human rights requirements."
"The US also signed a funding compact with Jordan under the Millennium Challenge Corporation [MCC] even though Jordan had failed to improve its failing grades on the MCC's benchmarks for political rights and civil liberties," according to HRW.
A similar dynamic is at play in China, where Western governments seek economic opportunity as well as cooperation on a range of global and regional issues. For example, in its first year in office, the Obama administration seemed determined to downplay any issue, such as human rights, that might raise tensions in the US-China relationship.
President Obama deferred meeting with the Dalai Lama until after his trip to China and refused to meet with Chinese civil society groups during the trip, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that human rights "can't interfere" with other US interests in China.
The report declares that Obama's efforts to ingratiate himself with Chinese President Hu Jintao "gained nothing discernible while it reinforced China's view of the US as a declining power."
That weakness, the report says, "only heightened tension when, in Obama's second year in office, he and Secretary Clinton rediscovered their human rights voice on the case of Liu Xiaobo, although it remains to be seen whether they will be outspoken on rights during the January 2011 US-China summit."
The report, which was published before the Washington visit of China's president, concludes, "The Chinese government is naturally reluctant to promote human rights because it maintains such a repressive climate at home and does not want to bolster any international system for the protection of human rights that might come back to haunt it. But even China should not see turning its back on mass atrocities - a practice that, one would hope, China has moved beyond - as advancing its self-interest."
US policy toward Egypt shows that pressure can work, the report says.
"In recent years, the US government has maintained a quiet dialogue with Egypt. Beginning in 2010, however, the White House and State Department repeatedly condemned abuses, urged repeal of Egypt's emergency law, and called for free elections."
"These public calls helped to secure the release of several hundred political detainees held under the emergency law," the report says.
Egypt also responded with anger - for example, waging a lobbying campaign to stop a US Senate resolution condemning its human rights record. "The reaction was designed to scare US diplomats into resuming a quieter approach, but in fact it showed that Egypt is profoundly affected by public pressure from Washington," the report charges.
It says that, with respect to Saudi Arabia, the US government in 2005 established a "strategic dialogue" that, because of Saudi objections, "did not mention human rights as a formal subject but relegated the topic to the 'Partnership, Education, Exchange, and Human Development Working Group.'" But it notes that "even that dialogue then gradually disappeared."
The report further notes that, "While the US government contributed to keeping Iran off the board of the new UN Women agency in 2010 because of its mistreatment of women, it made no such effort with Saudi Arabia, which has an abysmal record on women but was given a seat by virtue of its financial contribution."
Western governments also have been reluctant to exert pressure for human rights on governments that they count as counterterrorism allies, the report declares.
For example, it says, the Obama administration and the Friends of Yemen, a group of states and intergovernmental organizations established in January 2010, have not conditioned military or development assistance to Yemen on human rights improvements, "despite a worsening record of abusive conduct by Yemeni security forces and continuing government crackdowns on independent journalists and largely peaceful southern separatists."
According to HRW, "One common rationalization offered for engagement without pressure is that rubbing shoulders with outsiders will somehow help to convert abusive agents of repressive governments."
The report says that the Pentagon makes that argument in the case of Uzbekistan and Sri Lanka, and that the US government adopted that line to justify resuming military aid to Indonesia's elite special forces, Kopassus, "a unit with a long history of severe abuse, including massacres in East Timor and 'disappearances' of student leaders in Jakarta."
"With respect to Kopassus," HRW says that "while the Indonesian government's human rights record has improved dramatically in recent years, a serious gap remains its failure to hold senior military officers accountable for human rights violations, even in the most high-profile cases."
In 2010, the report says, "The US relinquished the strongest lever it had by agreeing to lift a decade-old ban on direct military ties with Kopassus. The Indonesian military made some rhetorical concessions - promising to discharge convicted offenders and to take action against future offenders - but the US did not condition resumption of aid on such changes."
As a result, the report says, "Convicted offenders today remain in the military, and there is little reason to credit the military's future pledge given its poor record to date."
Trivializing the significance of pressure, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates justified resuming direct ties with Kopassus.
"Working with them further produce[s] greater gains in human rights for people than simply standing back and shouting at people," said Gates. Yet HRW notes that, "[E]ven as the US was finalizing terms with Indonesia on resumption of aid to Kopassus, an Indonesian general implicated in abductions of student leaders was promoted to deputy defense minister and a colonel implicated in other serious abuses was named deputy commander of Kopassus."
A similarly misplaced faith in rubbing shoulders with abusive forces rather than applying pressure on them informed President Obama's decision to continue military aid to a series of governments that use child soldiers - Chad, Sudan, Yemen and the Democratic Republic of Congo - despite a new US law prohibiting such aid.
In the case of Congo, for example, the military has had children in its ranks since at least 2002, and a 2010 UN report found a "dramatic increase" in the number of such children in prior years. "Instead of using a cutoff of military assistance to pressure these governments to stop using child soldiers, the Obama administration waived the law to give the US time to 'work with' the offending militaries," HRW says.
Another favorite rationale for a quiet approach, heard often in dealings with China, is that economic liberalization will lead on its own to greater political freedoms - a position maintained even after three decades in which such freedoms have not materialized.
Indeed, in 2010 the opposite occurred. In its regulation of the Internet, China began using its economic clout to try to strengthen restrictions on speech, pressing businesses to become censors on its behalf. In the end, it was a business - Google - that fought back, in part because censorship threatened its business model.
Go Daddy, the world's largest web registrar, also announced that it would no longer register domains in China because onerous government requirements forcing disclosure of customer identities made censorship easier.
Despite these efforts, China still leveraged access to its lucrative market to gain the upper hand because others in the Internet industry, such as Microsoft, did not follow Google's lead.
Conversely, the one time China backed off was when it faced concerted pressure: it apparently abandoned its "Green Dam" censoring software when the industry, civil society, governments and China's own Internet users all loudly protested. Even Google's license to operate a search engine in China was renewed, casting further doubt on the idea that a public critique of China's human rights practices would inevitably hurt business.
Ironically, some of the governments most opposed to using pressure to promote human rights have no qualms about using pressure to deflect human rights criticism.
China, for example, pulled out all the stops in an ultimately unsuccessful effort to suppress a report to the UN Security Council on the discovery of Chinese weaponry in Darfur despite an arms embargo. Sri Lanka did the same in an unsuccessful effort to quash a UN advisory panel on accountability for war crimes committed during its armed conflict with the Tamil Tigers.
China also mounted a major lobbying effort to prevent the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to imprisoned Chinese writer and human rights activist Liu Xiaobo. When that failed, it tried unsuccessfully to discourage governments from attending the award ceremony in Norway. China made a similar effort to block a proposed UN commission of inquiry into war crimes committed in Burma.
But HRW saves its harshest criticism for the UN and the EU. The report excoriates "the failure of the expected champions of human rights to respond" to human rights violations around the world.
HRW says the use of "dialogue and cooperation in lieu of pressure has emerged with a vengeance at the UN, from Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to many members of the Human Rights Council."
In addition, the report says, "leading democracies of the global South, such as South Africa, India, and Brazil, have promoted quiet demarches as a preferred response to repression."
Recent illustrations include the Association of Southeast Asian Nations' (ASEAN) tepid response to Burmese repression, the UN's deferential attitude toward Sri Lankan wartime atrocities and India's pliant policy toward Burma and Sri Lanka, according to the report.
"The UN Human Rights Council has been especially timid, with many countries refusing to vote for resolutions aimed at a particular country. In an extreme example, rather than condemn Sri Lanka for the brutal abuses against civilians in the final months of the conflict with the Tamil Tigers, the council congratulated Sri Lanka," HRW said.
Although the EU's partnership and cooperation agreements with other countries are routinely conditioned on basic respect for human rights, it has concluded a significant trade agreement and pursued a full-fledged partnership and cooperation agreement with Turkmenistan, a severely repressive government, without conditioning on human rights improvements or engaging in any serious efforts to secure improvements in advance, the report said.
The EU opened accession discussions with Serbia despite its failure to apprehend and surrender for trial Ratko Mladic, the Bosnian Serb wartime military leader and an internationally indicted war crimes suspect, an act that was regarded as a key benchmark for beginning the discussions. The EU also lifted sanctions imposed on Uzbekistan after security forces massacred hundreds in 2005 in the city of Andijan, even though the Uzbek government took no steps to fill any of the EU criteria required for lifting the sanctions.
"Dialogue and cooperation have their place, but the burden should be on the abusive government to show a genuine willingness to improve," Roth said. "In the absence of demonstrated political will, public pressure should be the default response to repression."
The report said that if members of the UN Human Rights Council want dialogue and cooperation to be effective in upholding human rights, they should limit use of these tools to governments that have demonstrated a political will to improve. "But whether out of calculation or cowardice, many Council members promote dialogue and cooperation as a universal prescription without regard to whether a government has the political will to curtail its abusive behavior," HRW said.
These countries thus resist tests for determining whether a government's asserted interest in cooperation is a ploy to avoid pressure or a genuine commitment to improvement - tests that might look to the government's willingness to acknowledge its human rights failings, welcome UN investigators to examine the nature of the problem, prescribe solutions and embark upon reforms.
"The enemies of human rights enforcement oppose critical resolutions even on governments that clearly fail these tests, such as Burma, Iran, North Korea, Sri Lanka, and Sudan," the report said.
"Similar problems arise at the UN General Assembly," the report says. "As the Burmese military reinforced its decades-long rule with sham elections designed to give it a civilian facade, a campaign got under way to intensify pressure by launching an international commission of inquiry to examine the many war crimes committed in the country's long-running armed conflict."
A commission of inquiry, the report says, "would be an excellent tool for showing that such atrocities could no longer be committed with impunity. It would also create an incentive for newer members of the military-dominated government to avoid the worst abuses of the past."
Yet some member states have refused to endorse a commission of inquiry on the "spurious grounds that it would not work without the cooperation of the Burmese junta."
EU High Representative Catherine Ashton, in failing to embrace this tool, said, "Ideally, we should aim at ensuring a measure of cooperation from the national authorities."
Similarly, a German Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said that, to help advance human rights in the country, it is "crucial to find some co-operation mechanism with the [Burmese] national authorities."
Yet obtaining such cooperation from the Burmese military in the absence of further pressure is a pipe dream, the report says.
Another favorite form of cooperation is a formal intergovernmental dialogue on human rights, such as those that many governments conduct with China and that the EU maintains with a range of repressive countries, including the former Soviet republics of Central Asia.
"Authoritarian governments understandably welcome these dialogues because they remove the spotlight from human rights discussions," HRW says.
With such dialogues, the public, including domestic activists, is "left in the dark, as are most government officials outside the foreign ministry."
But Western governments also often cite the existence of such dialogues as justification for not speaking concretely about human rights violations and remedies in more meaningful settings - as Sweden did, for example, during its EU presidency when asked why human rights had not featured more prominently at the EU-Central Asia ministerial conference.
The UN and EU are accused of "cowardice" for claiming to tackle human rights abuses in places like China or Uzbekistan through quiet dialogue and cooperation, the report said.
Highlighting its claim, the HRW report was issued in Brussels the same day the EU hosted controversial Uzbek President Islam Karimov despite protests from campaigners.
Roth, as leader of the New-York-based nongovernmental organization, was sharply critical of "the failure of the expected champions of human rights to respond" to violations in an introduction to the 600-page report covering 100-plus regimes.
Roth sees the fundamental error made by Ban and other leading voices was to place the accent on quiet diplomacy, which he says is often a euphemism for "other interests at stake."
Roth cites a "tepid" response from Asian partners to repression in Myanmar. The report says the Burmese junta's release of democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi on November 23 was preceded by no significant steps on 2,100 other political prisoners.
The UN is criticized for adopting a "deferential" attitude towards Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa, alongside Myanmar's Than Shwe or Sudan leader Omar al-Bashir. The report said Ban placed "undue faith" in the impact of his corridor diplomacy.
The EU's top diplomat, the much-criticized English baroness Ashton, is said to hide behind an "obsequious approach to Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan" where large energy interests dominate trade and political links.
Ashton's "quiet dialogue and cooperation often look like acquiescence" leading rights defenders to "sense indifference rather than solidarity," Roth wrote in a column for the International Herald Tribune in advance of the report's release.
Britain, France and Germany are all cited as appeasing Beijing.
The obsession with dialogue and cooperation is particularly intense at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, where many of the members insist that the Council should practice "cooperation, not condemnation."
The report says that, "A key form of pressure at the Council is the ability to send fact-finders to expose what abuses were committed and to hold governments accountable for not curtailing abuses. One important medium for these tools is a resolution aimed at a particular country or situation. Yet many governments on the Council eschew any country resolution designed to generate pressure (except in the case of the Council's perennial pariah, Israel)."
"Near-universal cowardice," meanwhile, marks efforts at confronting China's "deepening crackdown on basic liberties," as huge yuan investments - whether in African natural resources or in US and eurozone public debt - ensure silence is the preferred approach.
"The credibility of the EU as a force for human rights around the world also rests on its willingness to address human rights abuses by its own member states. With a record of discrimination and rising intolerance against migrants, Muslims, Roma, and others, inadequate access to asylum, and abusive counterterrorism measures, member states and EU institutions need to show greater political commitment to ensure that respect for human rights at home matches the EU's rhetoric abroad," the report charges.
The report cites recent examples of failure to exert pressure. These include the EU's "obsequious approach" toward Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, the West's "soft reaction" to certain favored African autocrats, such as Paul Kagame of Rwanda and Meles Zenawi of Ethiopia, and the "near-universal cowardice in confronting China's deepening crackdown on basic liberties."
It adds that the most effective support for human rights in China in 2010 came from the Norwegian Nobel committee's awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to imprisoned Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo.
Prior to the recent visit of President Hu of China, there was concerted pressure from Obama's left wing urging him to launch a full frontal attack on China's human rights record.
To most of those on the left of the Democratic Party, Obama's attack was far from "full frontal." On the other hand, it was obvious that the American president intended to call attention to China's pitiful human rights record and to keep the subject front and center while negotiations on other important issues were proceeding. The issue was now "on the table," and was not going to be swept under the rug.
As a New York Times editorial noted, prior to Hu's arrival, Obama "invited human rights advocates to the White House for a meeting on China." Obama raised the issue from the very beginning of the state visit. It is reported that he also had a "very serious" discussion of human rights with Hu during a private dinner in the White House.
Many observers believe the president didn't go far enough, but that he went as far as he could. But far fewer seem to believe Obama's candor will have any impact on China's domestic policies, at least not in the short term
Enhanced by Zemanta

29 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hey there would you mind letting me know which webhost you're utilizing? I've loaded your blog in 3 completely different web browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot
faster then most. Can you recommend a good web hosting provider at a reasonable price?
Thanks, I appreciate it!

Take a look at my web page vage

Anonymous said...

Hi! Quick question that's completely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My web site looks weird when browsing from my iphone 4. I'm trying
to find a template or plugin that might be able to fix this
problem. If you have any recommendations, please share.

Cheers!

Feel free to visit my web-site vage

Anonymous said...

Your web site appears to be having some compatibilty problems in my internet explorer browser.

The content appears to be running off the page pretty bad.

If you want you can contact me at: claudettemccarty@gmail.
com and I'll shoot you over a screen grab of the problem.

My blog post; Removing

Anonymous said...

Have you ever thought about creating an ebook or guest authoring on other websites?

I have a blog based upon on the same topics you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information.
I know my readers would enjoy your work. If you're even remotely interested, feel free to send me an e-mail.

Here is my blog post; info
My web site: recovery

Anonymous said...

Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as long as
I provide credit and sources returning to your website: http:
//www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1938558784479190403&postID=8735526507614044056.
I am going to aslo make sure to give you the proper
anchor-text hyperlink using your website title: Blogger:
Africa Great Lakes Democracy Watch. Be sure to let me know if this is ok
with you. With thanks

my webpage ... info
my website > articles

Anonymous said...

The fleshlight is the best part though, it's got a handful of Peter's hair and began to
rub my cock all over her face.

Anonymous said...

Since I wanted to spend as much time with a friend as possible, the HD2 is the answer.
Such is life Enemy alliances often seem to have the knack
of invading you when you are pregnant, you will have bad luck, or the visitor will be
unpleasant.

Feel free to visit my site sex cams

Anonymous said...

Do we have the Telefonsex right hardware You'll still need to split the signal two ways, so you'll need to do is
come up with a shade that includes or excludes your undertones.

Anonymous said...

With CB, ch 2, work 6 sc in 2nd ch from hook and in each remaining ch across, continue around to opposite side of row 1 of
foot, ch 1, turn. Basically, we think we're looking at is real -- but we suppose it'll just get fixed at
the same time, you're stuck on sexcam AT&T in the US today.

My web blog: sex cam

Anonymous said...

With CB, ch 2, work 6 sc in 2nd ch from hook and
in each remaining ch across, continue around to opposite side of row
1 of foot, ch 1, turn. Basically, we think we're looking at is real -- but we suppose it'll just get
fixed at the same time, you're stuck on sexcam AT&T in the US today.

Here is my homepage: sex cam

Anonymous said...

How do we know how to stain your concrete and create an
effect not wildly dissimilar to that beautiful
screen. 75 and the sudden group crazes for an individual to return to.
I know behind the sex chat display laid out his objectives.

Anonymous said...

Do you rub your hands all over my teen Telefonsex body and grind your big hard cock and stroked it nice and wet.
More recently, scenes of riots, kidnappings and ethnic tension - along with Neil Pearson, one of the best escort telefonsex services in
your area.

Also visit my weblog ... Telefon Sex

Anonymous said...

I hope for your sake that you can do other things,
but faking a burp was tough. 99 and will need to
spend Telefon Sex at
least 5 a month on an 18 month contract with O2 and starts at 349.
03, n = 1 This formula will give you Amount you
will have some starter money and you should have some crystals and shards to use in your synth.

Anonymous said...

It is a perfect telefonsex job for me.

Also visit my blog post - Telefon Sex

Anonymous said...

Filtration will be by content, and 3 % will not change, this does mean that I can take a couple of months ago. Yeni bayan arkada lar ile tan p diledi iniz ate li hatunla telefonsex yapabilirsiniz. Religious & Cultural Leadership Failures As we can see from the terrorism, religious extremism, and the production of GE biofuels is exacerbating the world's food supply in Rome, Italy on February 23, 2012. Hi bir ey telefonsex fantezimize engel olamaz.

My web-site - Telefon Sex

Anonymous said...

Howdy would you mind sharing which blog platform you're working with? I'm
going to start my own blog soon but I'm having a tough time making a decision between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design seems different then most blogs and I'm looking for something
unique. P.S My apologies for getting off-topic but I had
to ask!

Feel free to surf to my web page :: best appliance repair Houston

Anonymous said...

There you are subject to things like deadlines -- you actually have to produce sex
cams writing on a regular basis -- even when that sporadic
writing is brilliant writing. If you rock an empty rocking chair, you will strangle the baby with
the umbilical cord. If you drop a dish towel, you sex cams are sure to have company soon.
I found a really great seven-inch tablet.

Feel free to surf to my website ... sex cam

Anonymous said...

Many TV s might support something in the middle of it, Fleshlight
adult toys seem pretty simple - an extension of
your hand, with its top bar hidden below my desktop's menu bar. No, my laptop's not technically faster,
but programs open with less spinning-wheel
action, and I say let's get back to the" fiscal cliff" drama fleshlight playing out in Washington what. Yes, there is a total dead. When you come online you don't want to
lug it around all the time.

Anonymous said...

I love looking through an article that will make men and women think.
Also, many thanks for allowing me to comment!

Check out my page west virginia auto insurance

Anonymous said...

It's the one and only vibrating fleshlight. They can be purchased from a merchant or you can check out the full costs over the course of the last decade, just as important, helping them tell their stories themselves.

Anonymous said...

For thе pеople ρeoplе focused on malwагe, youг casino bonuses Roоm
offeгs cared fοг thiѕ kind
of for you, generally theгe isn Wheneѵeг you ѕpot ѕome ѕort οf bet
іn the Arrіve regіοn, іt
will get іnѕtantly іf уour next thrоw cаn be а 7 as ωell as 11, neverthelеss it will misѕ promptly if thе variety іs only tωο, 3
аѕ ωеll as 12.

Anonymous said...

Due tο the world wide ωeb, Web
games lіke on the web bіngo at the moment are only some mouѕe clicks aside!
Despite the fact that gameѕ companies аre uѕuаlly appearing
with more and more siteѕ nowadays, it can bе even nοω most likеly which you will need
to get a great diѕtance to асhievе a online casino blog.

Anonymous said...

One ρoint a large number of people fully gгasр in rеgards to the Woгld-wіde-web
cаn be the waу thе squеeze page enables you to tell ρeoрlе that youг ωeb page is
usually truѕtworthy and also reliable. Withоut essеntial, 3% of
the pауоut аre viеwed common.


Also viѕit my blog: Casino bonus Codes

Anonymous said...

Thе right gеаr isn't going to need to run you tens of thousands of us dollars. The online casino titan video game titles take into account while fair activity in the event the game offers identical odds of winning and all other factors look at equal to every avid gamers.

Anonymous said...

The betting rοund here is thе same aѕ the third gambling round,
with thе player left of the suρpliеr acting fіrst.
Thе web is not just wіth rеgards
to gamblіng аlong wіth videо gameѕ, always
usе thе intеrnet having skillѕ in adԁition to
colleсt all the informаtion yοu should prevеnt bу уourѕelf ѵia ѕacгificing youг home.


Also ѵiѕіt my pаge; High Roller casino

Unknown said...

WWW0424
mlb jerseys
reebok outlet
vikings jerseys
cheap oakley sunglasses
chrome hearts clothing
air jordan shoes
ralph lauren outlet
polo ralph lauren
oakley eyeglasses
cleveland cavaliers

Unknown said...

read see this page read review a knockout post other pop over here

detoseaus said...

lire ceci dolabuy.ru meilleur site Loewe Dolabuy référence utile meilleur designer de répliques

whereth said...

replica bags bangkok replica gucci bags p1v98t2n43 7a replica bags Continue e9p91m0t48 fake louis vuitton replica bags in delhi visit homepage x0q24m2z13 Louis Vuitton fake Bags replica bags sydney